Gerasimov Doktrininin Hibrit Savaş Olgusu İle İlişkiselliğinin Rus Savaş Algısına Yansıması: Gürcistan Krizi
Author :
Abstract
Egemen devletlerin kurulumundan Soğuk Savaş’ın nihayetine kadar geçen sürede lineer savaşlar önemli savaş unsuru olarak var olurken, Soğuk Savaş’ın akabinde ikili yapının sona ermesi ve küresel boyut kazanan savaş teknolojileri sebebiyle lineer savaşların yıkıcı, şiddet boyutunun etkisi aktörler tarafından riske alınmaması gibi sebeplerle savaş faaliyetlerinde ciddi dönüşümler ve değişimler gerçekleşmiş; pek çok unsurun birlikte kullanılarak hasım aktörün güçsüzleşmesine odaklanan “Hibrit Savaş” modern savaş şekli olarak ön plana çıkmıştır. Gerasimov doktrini, hibrit yöntemlerin ve asimetrik savaş stratejisinin ilk uygulaması olmasa da bir ülkenin hibrit savaş terimini politik-askeri düzeyde ilk defa kabul etmesi, bu çerçeveye uygun bir yöntem oluşturması, taktiksel-operasyonel kurumların da bu politika ve yöntem etrafında biçimlendirilmesi ile eşsiz bir örnek teşkil etmesi bakımından oldukça önemli görülmektedir. Rusya’nın bu doktrinle birlikte savaş algısı değişmiştir. Gerasimov Doktrini ile Rusya’nın, askeri niteliğe sahip olmayan yöntemleri kullanarak daha az konvansiyonel güç ile daha az insan kaybı ve maliyet elde edip sıcak çatışma süreçlerini yönlendirmeyi ve yönetmeyi amaçlayacağı vurgulanmaktadır.
Buradan yola çıkılarak hazırlanan bu çalışmada, Gerasimov doktrini ışığında Gürcistan krizi incelenmiş ve bu vaka üzerinden Rus hibrit savaş yöntemlerinin etkisi sorgulanmıştır.
Keywords
Abstract
While linear wars existed as an important element of war in the period from the establishment of sovereign states to the end of the Cold War, the end of the dual structure after the Cold War and the war technologies that gained a global dimension, linear wars were destructive and the effects of violence were not taken at risk by the actors. serious transformations and changes took place in its activities; “Hybrid War”, which focuses on the weakening of the opposing actor by using many elements together, has come to the fore as a form of modern warfare. Although the Gerasimov doctrine is not the first application of hybrid methods and asymmetric warfare strategy, it is the first time a country has adopted the term hybrid warfare at the politico-military level, created a method suitable for this framework, and formed a unique example with the formation of tactical-operational institutions around this policy and method. appears to be quite important. With this doctrine, Russia's perception of war has changed. With the Gerasimov Doctrine, it is emphasized that Russia will aim to direct and manage the hot conflict processes by using non-military methods, with less conventional power and less human loss and cost.
In this study, which was prepared based on this, the Georgian crisis was examined in the light of the Gerasimov doctrine and the effect of Russian hybrid warfare methods was questioned through this case.
Keywords
- 1. Ağır, O. ve Tatlı, M. (2020). Bir Hibrit Savaş Yöntemi Olarak Terör ve Suriye İç Savaşı. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (AKSOS). 8(35): 35-56
- 2. Asmus, R. D. (2010)., A Little War That Shook the World: Georgia, Russia, and the Future of the West. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- 3. Bachmann, S.D. ve H.Gunneriusson. (2015). Hybrid Wars: The 21st Century’s New Threats to Global Peace and Security, Scientia Militaria - South African Journal of Military Studies, 43(1): 77-98.
- 4. Bartles, C. K. (2016). Getting Gerasimov Right, United States Army Combined Arms Center, Military Review. 30-38. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Getting-Gerasimov-RightBartles/3097a69963f09d108e0abe0757ba71694e2749a0 (07.06.2022).
- 5. Belozerov, V. and Solovyev, A. V. (2015). ‘Gibridnaya Voyna v otechestvennom politicheskom i nauchnom diskurse’ [Hybrid war in domestic political and acedemic discourse], Vlast’, 9 (23): 5–11.
- 6. Berzins, J. (2014). Russia’s New Generation Warfare in Ukraine: Implications for Latvian Defense Policy. https://sldinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/New-Generation-Warfare.pdf (07.06.2022).
- 7. Boot, M., ve Doran, M. (2013). Political Warfare, PolicyInnovation Memorandum No.33 (ABD Dış İlişkiler Konseyi Politika Geliştirme Kâğıdı No.33). , http://www.cfr.org/wars-and-warfare/politicalwarfare/p30894. (07.06.2022).
- 8. Bush, J. (2008). The Russia-Georgia War Revisited,” Business Week, https://warontherocks.com/2018/09/russian-performance-in-the-russo-georgian-war-revisited/. (07.06.2022).
- 9. Chivers, C. J. (2004). Georgia’s New Leader Baffles U.S. and Russia Alike, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/17/world/georgia-s-new-leader-baffles-us-and-russia-alike.html.
- 10. Cornell, S. E., and Starr, S. F. (2009). The Guns of August 2008: Russia’s War in Georgia. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe
- 11. Deep, A. (2015). Hybrid War: Old Concept, New Techniques, Small WarsJournal. https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/hybrid-war-old-concept-new-techniques. (07.06.2022).
- 12. Fridman, O. (2019). On Gerasimov Doctrine: Why the West Fails to Beat Russia to the Punch. Prism. 8(2): 101-112.
- 13. Galeotti, M. (2014). Putin, Ukraine And Asymmetric Politics. bneIntellinews. https://www.intellinews.com/comment-putin-ukraine-and-asymmetric-politics-500399277/?archive=bne.
- 14. Gerasimov, V. (2016). Gibridnaya voyna trebuyet vysokotekhnologichnogo oruzhiya i nauchnogo obosnovaniya. https://vpk-news.ru/articles/29579 (07.06.2022).
- 15. Gerasimov, V.(2013). ‘Tsennost’ nauki v predvidenii: Novyye vyzovy trebuyut pereosmyslit’ formy i sposoby vedeniya boyevykh deystviy’ [The value of science is in foresight: new challenges demand rethinking the forms and methods of carrying out combat operations], Voyenno- Promyshlennyy Kurier, (2013); https://www.armyupress.army.mil/portals/7/militaryreview/archives/english/militaryreview_20160228_ar t008.pdf (07.06.2022).
- 16. Gorbachov, M. (2013). Kibervoynauzheidyot [A Cyber-War Is Already On), Nezavisimoyevoyennoyeobozreniye, https://blogs.voanews.com/russian/donald-jensen-washingtondiary/2015/04/06/кибервойна-против-украины/ (07.06.2022)
- 17. Gordadze, T. (2009). Georgian-Russian Relations in the 1990s. In The Guns of August 2008: Russia’s War in Georgia, edited by Svante E. Cornell, and S. Frederick Starr, 28–48. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
- 18. Grant, G. (2008). Hybrid Wars. Government Executive. 40(5). https://www.govexec.com/magazine/features/2008/05/hybrid-wars/26799/. (07.06.2022).
- 19. Hoffman F. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars, Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, Arlington, VA, Aralık 2007, http://www.potomacinstitute.org/images/stories/publications/potomac_hybridwar_0108.pdf (07.06.2022).
- 21. Jones M. (2012). Fighting This Nation of Liars to the very end: The German Army in the Franco-Prussian War, 1870-1871, Williamson Murray ve Peter R. Mansoor (der.), Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present (171-198). Cambridge University Press.Cambridge.
- 22. Karaosmanoğlu, A. L. (2011). Yirmibirinci Yüzyılda Savaşı Tartışmak: Clausewitz Yeniden. Uluslararası İlişkiler. 8 (29): 5-25.
- 23. Korybko, A. (2015). Hybrid Wars: The Indirect Adaptive Approach to Regime Change, Moscow: People’s Friendship University of Russia.
- 24. Mansoor, P. R. (2012). Introduction: HybridWarfare in History, Williamson Murray ve Peter R. Mansoor (der.), HybridWarfare: Fighting Complex Opponentsfromthe Ancient World to the Present, Cambridge University Press, New York.
- 25. Mattsson P. (2015). Russian Military Thinking - A New Generation of Warfare, Journal on Baltic Security, 1(1): 61-70. http://www.baltdefcol.org/files/files/journal/JOBS01.pdf (07.06.2022).
- 26. Maxwell, D. (2014). Takıng A Spoon To A Gunfıght.War on theRocks https://warontherocks.com/2014/04/taking-a-spoon-to-a-gunfight/. (07.06.2022)
- 27. McDermott, R. N. (2016). Does Russia Have a Gerasimov Doctrine?, Parameters 46(1): 97-105.
- 28. NATO StratCom CoE Raporu, (2014). Analysis of Russia’s Information Campaign Against Ukraine, NATO Stratejik İletişim Mükemmeliyet Merkezi (NATO StratCom COE) Raporu, Riga, Latvia, https://stratcomcoe.org/cuploads/pfiles/russian_information_campaign_public_12012016fin.pdf.
- 29. Oliker O. (2015). Russia’s New Military Doctrine: Same as the Old Doctrine, Mostly, The Washington Posthttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2015/01/15/russias-new-military-doctrinesame-as-the-old-doctrine-mostly/. (07.06.2022).
- 30. Panarin, I. (2016). Gibridnaya voyna protiv Rossii, 1816–2016 gg [Hybrid war against Russia, 1816– 2016], Moscow: Goryachaya Liniya-Telekom.
- 31. Pomerantsev, P. and M. Weiss. (2014). “The Menace of Unreality: How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money.” The Interpreter. http://www.interpretermag.com/wpcontent/uploads/2014/11/The_Menace_of_Unreality_Final.pdf.
- 32. Smith E.A. (2003). Effects-Based Operations: Applying Network Centric Warfare in Peace, Crisis, and War, US DoD Command and Control Research Program (CCRP), http://www.dodccrp.org/files/Smith_EBO.pdf. (07.06.2022).
- 33. Sun-Tzu. The Art of War, Bölüm 4/12, (çeviri Sonshi Grup), https://www.sonshi.com/original-the-art-of- war translation-not-giles.html (07.06.2022).
- 34. Tchekinov, S.G. ve S.A. Bogdanov. (2013). The Nature and Content of a New-Generation War, Military Thought: A Russian Journal of Military Theory and Strategy, Sayı 4:12-23. https://isij.eu/article/natureand-content-new-generation-war (07.06.2022).
- 35. Tenenbaum, E. (2015). HybridWarfare in the Strategic Spectrum: An HistoricalAssessment (95-113). GuillaumeLasconjariasandJefrey A. Larsen (Edt.). NATO’sResponsetoHybridhreats. Italy: NDC Forum Papers Series.
- 36. Thomas, T. (2016). Gerasimov on Countering Hybrid War, OEWATCH - Foreign News and Perspectives of the Operational Environment 6(4). http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/ adresinden 13 Ararlık 2021’de alınmıştır.
- 38. Tsygankov, P. (2015). Gibridnyye Voyny v khaotiziruyushchemsya mire XXI veka [Hybrid wars in the chaotic world of the twenty-first century], Moscow: Moscow University Press.
- 39. Vladimirov A. (2015). General Theory of War Presented in RIAC, Russian International Affairs Council, http://russiancouncil.ru/en/inner/?id_4=3539#top-content (07.06.2022).
- 41. Warden J.A. (1995). The Enemy as a System, Airpower Journal, 1(7): 40-55. https://media.defense.gov/2017/Dec/27/2001861508/-1//0/T_0029_FADOK_BOYD_AND_WARDEN.PDF. (07.06.2022).
- 42. Wijk, R. (2012). Hybrid Conflict and the Changing Nature of Actors. Julia Lindley-French ve Yvew Boyer (der.), The Oxford Handbook of War (358-372). Oxford University Press. Oxford.
- 43. Yamaguchi N. (2012). An Unexpected Encounter with Hybrid Warfare: The Japanese Experience in North China, 1937-1945”, Williamson Murray ve Peter R. Mansoor (der.), Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present (225-253). Cambridge University Press.
