Author :
Abstract
Liderlik 21. yüzyılda, küreselleşmeye yönelik eğilimler ve bilgi teknolojilerinde yaşanan hızlı değişimlerin neden olduğu hızlı rekabet ortamına uyum ve değişim ile mücadele eden organizasyonların başarısını belirleyen en önemli faktörlerden biri olarak görülmektedir. Bununla birlikte, liderlik sürecinin anlaşılmasına yönelik çok fazla teorik ve ampirik çalışma yapılmış olmasına rağmen bireylerin liderlik olma istekleri tam olarak açıklanamamıştır. Son yıllarda özellikle liderlik alanındaki bu eksikliği tamamlamak için liderlik etkinliğinde bireysel farklılıklar ve çeşitli liderlik davranışları arasındaki ilişkiyi anlamaya yönelik çalışmaların ön plana çıktığı görülmektedir. Kavramsal olarak tasarlanan bu araştırmanın temel amacı liderlik davranışının açıklanmasında önemli bir faktör olarak kabul edilen liderlik etme motivasyonuna ilişkin bir perspektif ortaya koymaktır. Bu temel amaç doğrultusunda, öncelikle liderlik motivasyonu ile ilgili daha önce yapılan araştırmalara yer verilecektir. Daha sonra Chan’in (1999; Chan ve Drasgow, 2001) bireylerin liderlik eğilimlerini motivasyon kavramı üzerinden açıklayan öncü çalışmalarından yola çıkarak liderlik eme motivasyonu kavramı açıklanacaktır.
Keywords
Abstract
Leadership in the 21st century is seen as one of the most important factors determining the success of organizations coping with change and the challenges in a fast competitive environment that globalization trends and information technologies have brought along by the time. In addition to this, there have been many theoretical and empirical studies on the understanding of the leadership process, yet the willingness of individuals to become leaders has not been fully explained. In recent years, it has been seen that efforts to understand the relationship between individual differences and various leadership behaviors in leadership effectiveness have been the main targets for completing this lack of leadership. The main purpose of this conceptually designed research is to present a perspective on motivation to lead which is considered as an important factor in explaining leadership behavior. For this core purpose, firstly, researches about leadership motivation will be included. Then, concept of motivation to lead will be explained by starting from the pioneering studies of Chan's (1999; Chan and Drasgow, 2001) leadership tendencies of individuals through the concept of motivation.
Keywords
- Allio, R. J. (2012). Leaders and Leadership – Many Theories, But What Advice is Reliable?, Strategy
- Allio, R. J. (2012). Leaders and Leadership – Many Theories, But What Advice is Reliable?, Strategy & Leadership, 41(1): 4-14.
- Amit, K., Lisak, A., Popper, M., and Gal, R. (2007). Motivation to Lead: Research on The Motivesfor Undertaking Leadership Roles in The Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Military Psychology, 19(3): 137–160.
- Amit, K. and Bar-Lev, S. (2012). Motivation-to-Lead in Multicultural Organizations: The Role ofWork Scripts and Political Perceptions, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(2): 169- 194.
- Bass, B. M. (1990). From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision, Organizational Dynamics, 18(3): 19-31.
- Berman, F. E. and Miner, J. B. (1985). Motivaton to Manage at The Top Executive Level: A Test of The Hierarchic Role-Motivation Theory. Personnel Psychology 38: 377-391.
- Brown, F.W., and Moshavi, D. (2005). Transformational Leadership and Emotional Intelligence: APotential Pathway for an Increased Understanding of Interpersonal Influence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 867-871.
- Bowers, D. G. and Seashore, S. E. C., (1966). Predicting Organizational Effectiveness with a Four- Factor Theory of Leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 11(2): 238-263.
- Buenger, D. K. (2016). Leadership Motivation in Accounting Students: Role of Locus of Control,Emotional Intelligence, and Sociability. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 10113695).
- Chan, K. Y. (1999). Toward a Theory of Individual Differences and Leadership: Understanding theMotivation To Lead. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9944813)
- Chan, K. Y., and Drasgow, F. (2001). Toward a Theory of Individual Differences and Leadership: Understanding the Motivation to Lead. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 481–498.
- Chan, K. Y., Rounds, J., and Drasgow, F. (2000). The Relation between Vocational Interests and the Motivation to Lead. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57: 226–245.
- Chen, C. C., Yu, C. K. and Miner, J. B (1997). Motivation to Manage: A Study of Women in Chinese State-Owned Enterprises. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33(2): 160-173.
- Chemers, M. M. (2000). Leadership Research and Theory: A Functional Integration. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(1): 27-43.
- Cho, Y., Harrist, S., Steele, M., and Murn, L. T. (2015). College Student Motivation to Lead İnRelations to Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Leadership Self-Efficacy. Journal of College Student Development, 56(1): 32-44.
- Clemmons, A. and Fields, D. (2011). Values as Determinants of the Motivation to Lead. Military Psychology, 23(6): 587-600.
- Çalışkan, S. C. (2008). Yöneticilerin Bireysel Yetkinliklerinin Liderlik Tarzları ve Lider ÜyeEtkileşimine Verdikleri Önem Üzerindeki Etkileri ve Bu Etkileşimde Kültürel Varsayımların Rolü, (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi) Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsi.
- DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N and Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait And BehavioralTheorıes of Leadership: An Integration and Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity, Personnel Psychology, 64: 7–52.
- Erickson, R. W. (2005). Exploring The Antecedents of Motivation to Lead and The Effects ofCollective Efficacy (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3158535).
- Fiedler, F. E., McGuire, M. and Richardson, M. (1989). The Role of Intelligence and Experience in Successful Group Performance, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 1(2): 132-149.
- Gagnon M., Godın, G., Gagne, C., Fortına, J. P., Reġnharz, D., Cloutġer, A, (2003). An Adaptationof The Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour to The Study of Telemedicine Adoption by Physicians‖, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 71: 103-115.
- Graen, G.B., and Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Developmentof Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years: Applying A Multi-Level Multi-Domain Approach. Leadership Quarterly, 6: 219-247.
- Hendricks, J. and Payne, S. (2007). Beyond The Big Five: Leader Goal Orientation as a Predictor of Leadership Effectiveness, Human Performance, 20(4), 317–343.
- Hong, Y. (2005). Motivation to Lead: Antecedents and Resulting Leader Emergence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Saint Mary’s University, Nova Scotia, Canada.
- Hong, Y., Catano, V. M., and Liao, H. (2011). Leader Emergence: The Role of Emotional Intelligence and Motivation-To-Lead. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(4): 320-343.
- House, R. J. and Aditya, R. N. (1997). The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3): 409-473.
- House, R. J., Spangler, W. D., and Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and Charisma in The U.S.Presidency: A Psychological Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 364-396.
- Jago, G. (1982). Leadership: Perspectives in Theory and Research. Management Science, 28(3): 315- 336.
- Keating, K., Rosch, D. M., and Burgoon, L. (2014). Developmental Readiness for Leadership: TheDifferential Effects of Leadership Courses on Creating “Ready, Willing, And Able” Leaders. Journal of Leadership Education, 13(3): 1-16.
- Krauss S. E. and J. Abdul Hamid, (2015). Exploring The Relationship Between Campus LeadershipDevelopment And Undergraduate Student Motivation to Lead among a Malaysian Sample, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(1): 1-26.
- Krishnakumar, S., and Hopkins, K. (2014). The Role of Emotion Perception Ability in Motivation to Lead. Management Research Review, 37(4): 334-347.
- Lee, K. C. (2007). Principles of Design Leadership for Industrial Design Teams in Taiwan, Design Studies, 28(4): 437-462.
- Lieberson, S., ve O’Connor, J. F. (1972). Leadership and Organizational Performance: A study of Large Corporations. American Sociological Review, 37, 117-130.
- Lord, R. G., De Vader, C. L., and Alliger, G. M. (1986). A Meta-Analysis of the Relation BetweenPersonality Traits and Leadership Perceptions: An Application of Validity Generalization Procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 402–410.
- Lord, R. G., and Hall, R. J. (1992). Contemporary Views of Leadership and Individual Differences. Leadership Quarterly, 3(2): 137-157.
- Lord, R. G., and Hall, R. J. (2005). Identity, Deep Structure and The Development of Leadership Skill. Leadership Quarterly, 16(4): 591-615.
- Lord, R. G. (1977). Functional Leadership Behavior: Measurement and Relation to Social Power and Leadership Perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22,(1): 114-133.
- McClelland, D. C. and Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). Leadership Motive Pattern and Long-Term Success in Management, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6): 737-743.
- Meyer, John P. Becker, Thomas E. and Vandenberghe, Christian (2004). Employee Commitment andMotivation: A Conceptual Analysis and Integrative Model, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6): 991–1007.
- Meyer, J. P., and Allen, N. J. (1991). A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment. Human Resources Management Review, 1(1): 61-89.
- Miner, J. B. (1978). Twenty Years of Research on Role Motivation Theory of Managerial Effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 31: 739-760.
- Miner, J. B., Crane, D. P., and Vandenberg, R. J. (1994). Congruence and Fit in Professional Role Motivation Theory. Organization Science, 5(1):86-97.
- Miner, J. B., Ebrahimi, B. and Wachtel, J. B (1995). How Deficiencies in Motivation to ManageContribute to the United States' Competitiveness Problem (and What Can Be Done about It), Human Resource Management, 34(3): 363-387.
- Pepper, R. C. (2009). The Impact of Motivation to Lead on College Students’ CocurricularInvolvement. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI Number: 3377773)
- Romano, R. (2007). Motivational Predictors of Leadership Effectiveness: A TransformationalFramework Exploring Motivation to Lead. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI Number: 3279759).
- Rosch, D. M., Collier, D. A., and Zehr, S. M. (2014). Self-vs-Teammate Assessment of LeadershipCompetence: The Effects of Gender, Leadership Self-Efficacy, and Motivation to Lead. Journal of Leadership Education, 31(2): 96-124.
- Rosch, D. M., Collier, D. A., and Thompson, S. E. (2015). An Exploration of Students’ Motivationto Lead: An Analysis by Race, Gender, and Student Leadership Behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 56(3): 286-291.
- Sanchez, S. A. (2003). The Relationship among Motivation to Lead, Cognitive Ability andPersonality (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI Number: 3096518)
- Shamir, B., House, R.J., and Arthur, M.B. (1993). The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: a Self-Concept Based Theory. Organization Science, 4: 1-17.
- Singer, M. (1991). The Relationship between Employee Sex, Length of Service and LeadershipAspirations: a Study from Valence, Self-Efficacy and Attribution Perspectives. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 40(4): 417-436.
- Smith, J. A. and Foti, R. J. (1998). A Pattern Approach to The Study of Leader Emergence, Leadership Quarterly, 9(2): 147-160.
- Stephens, J. L. (2012). The Effects of Calling, Career Commitment, and Organizational Commitmenton Motivation to Lead (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3532749).
- Thompson, G. and Glasø, L. (2015). Situational leadership theory: a test from three perspectives, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(5): 527-544.
- Van Iddekinge, C. H., Ferris,G. R. and Heffner, T. S. (2009). Test of A Multistage Model of Distal and Proximal Antecedents of Leader Performance, Personnel Psychology, 62: 463–495.
- Waldman, D. A., and Yammarino, F. J. (1999). CEO Charismatic leadership: Levels-of Management and Levels-of-Analysis effects. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 266-285.
- Waldman, D. A., Galvin, B. M., and Walumbwa, F. O. (2012). The Development of Motivation-to-Lead and Leader Role Identity. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(2): 156-168.
- Winter, D. G. (1991). A Motivatıonal Model of Leadershıp: Predicting Long-Term ManagementSuccess From Tat Measures of Power Motivation and Responsibility. Leadership Quarterly, 2(2): 67-Wofford, J. C. and Goodwin, V. L. (1994). A Cognitive Interpretation of Transactional and Transformational Leadership Theories, Leadership Quarterly, 5(2): 161-186.
- Yang, F. (2011). Work, Motivation and Personal Characteristics: an In-Depth Study of Six Organizations in Ningbo, Chinese Management Studies, 5(3): 272-297.
- Yukl, G. (1971). Toward a Behavioral Theory of Leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6: 414-440.
- Yukl G. (1999). An Evaluation of Conceptual Weaknesses in Transformational and Charismatic Leadership Theories‖, Leadership Quarterly, 10(2): 285-305.
- Yukl, G. and Van Fleet, D. D. (1992). Theory and Research on Leadership in Organizations. In M.Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 142–
