Author :
Abstract
Dönüşümcü liderlik, bireylerde ve sosyal alanda değişime neden olan bir liderlik yaklaşımı olarak tanımlanmaktadır. İdeal haliyle gelişmeyi hedefleyen takipçilerde değerli ve olumlu değişimler yaratır. Özgün biçimiyle, hayata geçirilen dönüşümsel liderlik motivasyonu ve morali artırır. Aynı zamanda, çeşitli mekanizmalar aracılığıyla takipçilerin performansı üzerinde de önemli derecede etkisi bulunmaktadır. Kuruluşun misyonuna ve kolektif kimliğine bağlı olarak, takipçiler için bir rol model oluşur ve onlara ilham verir. Dönüşümcü liderler, takipçileri çalışmalarına daha fazla sahip çıkmaya teşvik ederler. Takipçilerin güçlü ve zayıf yönleri tespit edilir. Böylece lider, takipçileri performanslarını optimize eden görevlerle donatabilir. İşlemci liderler ise, takipçilerinin ilham kaynağını ödül ve ceza sistemiyle ortaya koymaktadır. Takipçileri, liderini her yönüyle örnek alıyorsa ödülü hak eder. Fakat, liderinin aksine daha farklı yönlerden ona uyum sağlayamazsa cezalandırılır. İşlemsel ve dönüşümsel liderlik stilleri, son zamanlarda birçok araştırmacının ilgisini çekmektedir. Bir kısım insan bu kavramların benzer olduklarını düşünürken, diğerleri farklılıkların da olduğunu savunmaktadır. Bu araştırma, literatürdeki kanıtlardan yola çıkarak dönüştürücü ve işlemsel liderlik arasındaki farka giriş niteliğinde bir bakış açısı sunmaktadır. Çalışmada, dönüştürücü liderlik ve işlemsel liderlik kavramsal olarak farklı olmalarına rağmen, işlemsel liderliğin bazı unsurlarının dönüşümsel liderlikte yer aldığı sonucuna varılmaktadır. Yapılan bu araştırmada, öncelikli olarak konu ile ilgili literatürde yer alan çalışmalara ulaşılmış, ulaşılan araştırma bulguları derlenerek rapor haline getirilmiştir. Araştırmanın literatürdeki boşluğu doldurması beklenmektedir.
Keywords
Abstract
Transformational leadership is defined as a leadership approach that causes change in individuals and in the social field. It creates valuable and changes in followers who aim to develop in their ideal state. Learning the transformational leadership motivation and morale that are brought to life in its original form. At the same time, to learn word for word of realizations at the right time. It consists of a role model for followers and inspires them, depending on the organization's mission and collective. Transformational leaders encourage followers to take ownership of their work more. The strengths and weaknesses of the followers are determined. Thus, the leader can equip his followers with tasks that optimize their performance. Processor leaders, on the other hand, reveal the source of inspiration of their followers with the reward and punishment system. If the guide takes its leader as an example in all aspects, it deserves the award. But if his leader cannot adapt to him from different directions, he will be punished. Transactional and transformational leadership structures attract the attention of many researchers. One of the media's views of these concepts similarly argues for others. This research draws from the evidence in the literature to provide an introductory perspective on the difference between transformation and transactional leadership. It is concluded that transformational leadership and transactional leadership are conceptually different, and some elements of transactional leadership have a place in transformational leadership. In this study, first of all, the studies in the literature on the subject were reached, and the research cloud reached was compiled and turned into a report. The research is expected to fill the gap in the literature.
Keywords
- Bass, B. M. (1996).Anew paradigm of leadership: An inquiry into transformational leadership.
- Bass, B. M. (1996).Anew paradigm of leadership: An inquiry into transformational leadership. Alexandria,VA: U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
- Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Cole, G.A. (2006) Management Theory and Practice.(6th Ed.) London: Book Power Eisenbeiß, S. A. andBoerner, S. (2013) A Double-edged Sword: Transformational Leadership and Individual Creativity. British Journal of Management. 24(1): 54–68.
- Garcıa-Morales, V.J., Llorens-Montes, F.J. and Verdu Jover, A.J. (2008) The Effects of TransformationalLeadership on Organizational Performance through Knowledge and Innovation. British Journal of Management. 19(4): 299–319.
- Hargis, M. B., Wyatt, J.D., Piotrowski, C. (2001). Developing Leaders: Examining the Role of Transactionaland Transformational Leadership across Contexts Business. Organization Development Journal 29 (3): 51– 66.
- Hay, I (2012) Transformational Leadership Characteristics and Criticisms. Retrieved 17th March, 2013. http://www.leadingtoday.org/weleadinlearning/transformationalleadership.htm
- Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of controland support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891-902.
- Judge, T. A. and Bono, J. E. (2000) Five-Factor Model of Transformational Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology. Pp 751 – 765.
- Jung, D.D., and Sosik, J.J. (2002). Transformational Leadership in Work Groups: The Role of
- Keller, R.T (1992) Transformational leadership and the Development of Research and Development Project Groups. Journal of Management. 489 – 501.
- Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
- Piccolo, R.F, and Colquitt, J.A. (2006) Transformational Leadership and Job Behavior: The Mediating Role of Core Job Characteristics. Academy of Management Journal. Pp 327 – 340.
- Robbins, S. P. and Coulter, M. (2007) Management (9th ed.). London: Prentice- Hall.
- Rubin, R.S., Munz, D.D and Bommer, W.H. (2005) Leading from Within: effects of Emotional Recognitionand Personality on transformational Leadership Behavior. Academy of Management Journal. Pp 845 – 858.
- Warrilow. S (2012) Transformational Leadership Theory - The 4 Key Components in Leading Change&ManagingChange.[Retrieved15/03/2013].http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Steph Warrilow.
- Weihrich, H., Cannice, M.V. and Koontz, H. (2008) Management (12th ed.). New Delhi: Mc Graw Hill.
- Yukl, G. (1999) An Evaluation of the Conceptual Weaknesses in Transformational and Charismatic Leadership Theories. Leadership Quarterly. 10(2), 285–305.
