Author :
Abstract
Günümüzde kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk anlayışını benimseyen işletmeler; kendilerini sadece rakiplerinden farklılaştırabilmekle kalmaz, aynı zamanda toplumla var olan ilişkilerini güçlendirerek itibarlarını da artırırlar. Bu nedenle gerek işletmeler gerekse işletmenin paydaşları tarafından Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk kavramı giderek artan bir ilgi görmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı denizcilik alanında Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk konulu ulusal yazında yapılan çalışmaları sistematik bir bakış açısıyla incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda 2000-2020 yılları arasında gerçekleştirilen çalışmalar YÖK Tez Merkezi, TR Dizin ve Google Akademik veri tabanlarında taranmış, ulaşılan 8 çalışma bu araştırmaya dâhil edilerek bibliyometrik analize tabi tutulmuştur. Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk alanında ulusal yazında pek çok çalışmaya rastlanırken Denizcilik alanında Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk konusunun yeterince ele alınmadığı dikkat çekmektedir. Dünya ticaretinin yaklaşık yüzde 90'ının denizyolu ile yapıldığı göz önüne alındığında, akademik camianın konuyu bilimsel verilerle desteklemesi ve gelişmesine katkıda bulunmasının önemi açıkça görülmektedir.
Keywords
Abstract
In today, businesses which act with the understanding of corporate social responsibility do not only differentiate themselves from their competitors, but also enhance their reputation by strengthening their existing relations with society. Consequently , the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility has gained increasing interest both by businesses and its stakeholders. The aim of this study is to analyze the studies conducted on corporate social responsibility in the field of Maritime with a systematic point of view. For this purpose, the studies conducted between 2000 and 2020 were scanned in YÖK National Thesis Centre, TR Dizin and Google Academic databases, 8 studies were included in this study and subjected to bibliometric analysis. While many studies have been carried out in the field of Corporate Social Responsibility in the national literature, it is noteworthy that Corporate Social Responsibility in Maritime has not been adequately addressed. Considering that approximately 90 percent of world trade is carried out by sea transportation, the importance of the academic community supporting the subject with scientific data and contributing to its development is clearly seen.
Keywords
- Abe, M., & Ruanglikhitku, W. (2013). Convergence and Coherence in International CSR Instruments:
- Abe, M., & Ruanglikhitku, W. (2013). Convergence and Coherence in International CSR Instruments:Implications for business in the Asian and Pacific Region. In R. Ratnayake (Ed.), From corporate socialresponsibility to corporate sustainability: Moving the agenda forward in Asia and the Pacific (pp.1–102). New York: United Nations.
- Carroll, A.B. (1999). CSR: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505. 38, 268.
- Arli E. (2017). “The Importance Of Socıal Responsıbılıty In The Preference Of Port Operatıons By Internatıonal Commerce Companıes - A Study In Kocaeli Area _ Turkey.Pdf”, T.Y.
- Bonilla, C. A. José M. M., Carolina T. A. (2015). Economics İn Latin America: A Bibliometric Analysis, Scientometrics, Cilt:105, Sayı:2, Ss. 1239-1252.
- Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper&Row.Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance.Broadus, R. (1987). Toward A Definition Of “Bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5-6), 373-379
- Cebecı̇, O.(2017) “Corporate Socıal Responsıbılıty In Turkısh Marıtıme Industry: A Research On Shıpownıng Busınesses”, T.Y., 154.
- Çetin, Ç. K.; Varan, S.; Fişkin C. S. (2015). “Sürdürülebilirlik Raporlamasında Paydaş Katılımı: Türkiye’deki Firmaların Analizi”. Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi 6, Sy 1
- Çetin, Ç. K & Şakar G.D. (2015). “Value-Drıven Corporate Socıal Responsıbılıty In Ports”, T.Y., 25.
- Çıkıkçı A. & Sigali S. (2020). “Integrated Reporting In Shipping Industry: An Analysis Of International Shipping Companies”. Muhasebe Enstitüsü Dergisi - Journal Of Accounting Institute, Sy 62
- Davis, K. (1960). Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? California Management Review,2(3), 70–76.
- Davis, K., & Blomstrom, R. (1966). Business and its Environment. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Elkington, J. (1994) Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review, 36, 90-100.
- Grewal D. & Darlow N. J. (2007). The Business Paradigm for Corporate Social Reporting in the Context of Australian Seaports, Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2007, vol. 9, issue 2, 172-192
- Joyner, BE & Payne, D. (2002). 'Evolution and Implementation: a study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility', Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1), 297-31.
- Koca. Y. (2019). “Türk Denizcilik Sektöründe Sosyal Sorumluluk Faaliyetlerinin Kurumsal Ve Toplumsal Yarar Algısı Üzerine Bir Çalışma”, 34.
- Marens, R. (2008). The Hollowing Out of Corporate Social Responsibility: Abandoning a Tradition in an Age of Declining Hegemony. McGeorge Law Review, 39, 867–870.
- Murphy, M., & Vives, J. (2013). Perceptions of Justice and the Human Rights Protect, Respect, and Remedy Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(4), 781–797.
- Norton, M. J. (2001). Introductory Concepts İn İnformation Science. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
- Ozbag G. (2019). “Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Faaliyetlerinin Üretim Karşıtı İş Davranışları Üzerindeki Etkileri”. Tesam Akademi Dergisi, , 167-85.
- Preston, L. E., & Post, J. E. (1975). Private management and public policy: The principle of public responsibility. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Pritchard, A. (1969). “Statistical Bibliography Or Bibliometrics? ” Journal Of Documentation 24, 348-349
- Sanri Ö. & Kamanli A. I (2020). “Çalışanların Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Algısının İş Tatmini Ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetine Etkisi: Gemi Acentelerinde Bir Uygulama”, T.Y., 16.
- Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503–530.
- Spector, B. (2008). Business Responsibilities in a Divided World: The Cold War Roots of the CorporateSocial Responsibility Movement. Enterprise & Society: The International Journal of Business History, 9(2), 314–336.
- Skovgaard, J. (2018). Response to institutional processes: A study of corporate social responsibility inDanish shipping companies. In L. L. Froholdt (Ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility in the Maritime Industry, (ss. 279-293)Cham, Springer,
- Swanson, D. L. (1995). Addressing a theoretical problem by reorienting the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 20, 43-64.
- Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758–769.
- Williams, O. F. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Business in Sustainable Development.London: Routledge.
