Author :
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the stem awareness level of music teacher candidates and to determine the situations in which this awareness is affected by different variables. It is a descriptive field study and it was conducted with a survey model. The study group of this study consists of 34 (11 girls and 23 boys) education faculty students studying in the 3rd and 4th grades of the Department of Music Education, Department of Music Education at Kastamonu University, Faculty of Education, in the academic year of 2018-2019. As the data collection tool, "Conscious awareness scale" designed by Buyruk and Korkmaz was used. Within the scope of data analysis; Average, Anova, Schieffe and T-Tests were used. As a result of the analyzes made, it was observed that the Toad Conscious Awareness Scale, awareness of pre-service teachers was high and gender did not affect this awareness level. Researchers who want to examine the same subject can practice with different departments and larger study groups. In addition, they can analyze their state of awareness in terms of different variables.
Keywords
Abstract
The aim of this study is to determine the stem awareness level of music teacher candidates and to determine the situations in which this awareness is affected by different variables. It is a descriptive field study and it was conducted with a survey model. The study group of this study consists of 34 (11 girls and 23 boys) education faculty students studying in the 3rd and 4th grades of the Department of Music Education, Department of Music Education at Kastamonu University, Faculty of Education, in the academic year of 2018-2019. As the data collection tool, "Conscious awareness scale" designed by Buyruk and Korkmaz was used. Within the scope of data analysis; Average, Anova, Schieffe and T-Tests were used. As a result of the analyzes made, it was observed that the Toad Conscious Awareness Scale, awareness of pre-service teachers was high and gender did not affect this awareness level. Researchers who want to examine the same subject can practice with different departments and larger study groups. In addition, they can analyze their state of awareness in terms of different variables.
Keywords
- Akkoyun, F. (2001). Gestalt therapy. Nobel Publication and Distribution, 1. Edition, Ankara, 85- 89.
- Akkoyun, F. (2001). Gestalt therapy. Nobel Publication and Distribution, 1. Edition, Ankara, 85- 89.
- Akpınar, B. & Aydın, K. (2007). Change in education and teachers’ change perception.Education and Science, 32 (144), 71-80.
- Baran, E., Canbazoğlu Bilici, S., Mesutoğlu, C. (2015). Developing activity of Science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) Activity magazine based on research (ATED), 5(2), 60-69.
- Bybee, R. W. (2010a). Advancing education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
- Bybee, R. W. (2010b). What is education. Science, 329, 996. doi: 10.1126/science.1194998 Buyruk, B. &Korkmaz, Ö. (2016). Öğretmen Adaylarının STEM Farkındalık Düzeyleri. Online Başvuru , 2016 (3), 272- 279.
- Çorlu, M. A., Adıgüzel, T., Ayar, M. C., Çorlu, M. S. & Özel, S. (2012, June). Science, technology,engineering and math education. Interdisciplinary studies and interactions. Report presented in X. National Science and Math Education Congress, Niğde.
- Dökmen Ü. (2000). “Being aware of”. Who will be at tomorrow. Existing, developing and compromising in harmonization period. Sistem Publishing, First Edition, 122-139.
- Dugger, W. E. (2010, December). Evolution of STEM in the United States. Presented at the 6th BiennialInternational Conference on Technology Education Research, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.http://www.iteaconnect.org/Resources/PressRoom/AustraliaPaper.pdf
- Ercan, S., & Bozkurt, E. (2013). Expectations from engineering applications in science education: decision-making skill. IOSTE Eurasian Regional Symposium & Brojerage event Horizon 2020, Antalya, TURKEY.
- Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2004). Design-based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110.
- Gencer, A. (2015). Practise of science and engineering in science education: Fırıldak Activity, Activity magazine based on research (ATED), 5(1), 1-19.
- Gülhan, F., Şahin, F.(2016). Science, technology, engineering and math integration’s effect on 5. Gradestudents’ perception and attitudes related to these fields. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 602-620.
- Honey, M., Pearson, G. & Schweingruber, H. (Eds). National Academy of Engineering and NationalResearch Council (2014). İntegration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington D.C. : The National Academies Press.
- Keleş, Ö., 2007. Ecological footprint’s being practised and determined as a environment education tool towards sustainable life, Doctorate Thesis, Ankara.
- Lacey, T. A., & Wright, B. (2009). Occupational employment projections to 2018. Monthly Labor Review, November, 82-109.
- Marulcu, İ. & Sungur, K. (2012). Analyzing of science teacher candidates’ engineering and engineeringperceptions in addition to perspective of engineering design as a method. Afyon Kocatepe University Science Magazine , 12 (2012), 13-23.
- Moore, T.J., Stohlmann, M.S., Wang, H.-H., Tank, K.M., & Roehrig, G.H. (2013). Implementation andintegration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In J. Strobel, S. Purzer, & M. Cardella (Edt.),Engineering in precollege settings: Research into practice. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
- National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for k-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington DC: The National Academic Press.
- National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: NAP.
- Özdemir, O., 2012. The Environmentalism of University Students: Their Ethical Attitudes Toward the Environment, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43, 373-385.
- Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and engineering teacher, May/June 2012. http://www.iteaconnect.org/mbrsonly/Library/TTT/TTTe/04- 12roberts.pdf.
- Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3), 17-28.
- Roth, W. (2001). Learning Science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768-790.
- Schmidt, W. H. (2011, May). Which way to go? Paper presented at the National Research Council Workshopon Successful Education in K-12 Schools. Retrieved fromhttp://www7.nationalacademies.org/ Schools Workshop Paper Schmidt.pdf
- Sırakaya, M.(2011). Analyzing of teacher candidates’ problematic internet using and their internet self- efficacy levels, Published postgraduate thesis, Hacettepe University Science Instıtute.
- Smith, J. & Karr-Kidwell, P. (2000). The interdisciplinary curriculum: a literary review and a manual for administrators and teachers. Retrieved from database. (ED443172).
- Şahin, A., Ayar, M. C., Adıgüzel, T. (2014). After-school activities containing science, technology,engineering and math and their effects on students. Education Sciences in Theory and Practise, 14(1), 297- 322.
- Wagner, T. (2008). Rigor redefined. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 20-24.
- Turan, S., 2009. Effect of Biology lesson based on critical thinking skills on high school students’ ecological ethic approaches, Post graduate thesis, İzmir.
- Wendell, K., Connolly, K., Wright, C., Jarvin, L., Rogers, C., Barnett, M., & Marulcu, I. (2010, October).Incorporating engineering design into elementary school science curricula. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Society for Engineering Education. Singapore.
