Author :
Abstract
Yukarıdaki başlıkta, karşılaştırmalı sosyal politika, tanımlanmak istenmiştir. Sözlükte bu konuyla ilgili net bir tanım sunulmamaktadır. Bunun nedeni, tanımlamaya yönelik herhangi bir girişimin bulunmaması, bir veya iki paragraflık boşluk içindeki terimin açıklamaya karşılık gelmemesidir. Bu sadece bileşik bir terimi karakterize etmedeki zorluk nedeniyle değil, aynı zamanda her iki unsurun da tartışmalı doğasından kaynaklıdır. Sosyal politikanın odağı ve karşılaştırmalı yaklaşım olarak düşünülebilmektedir. Sosyal Politika akademik disiplin midir yoksa bir çalışma alanı mıdır? Hangi özel programlar sosyal politika olarak görülmelidir ve hangisi bu özel programlarda olmamalıdır? Karşılaştırmalı sosyal politika analizi nedir ve sosyal bilimlerdeki stratejiler, diğer nitel veya nicel araştırmalardan farklı mıdır? Açık veya örtük olarak, doğası gereği karşılaştırmalı olmayan bilimsel araştırma var mıdır? Bu çalışmada, yer verilecek tanımsal problemlerden bazılarına değinilmiştir. Karşılaştırmalı sosyalliğin ne olduğunu açıklayabilmek için kapsamlı bir iddiada bulunulmamaktadır, bunun yerine daha yerleşik bir politika üzerinde durularak, tanımsal haritalama uygulamasına girmenin sınırları yerine oturttuğu nihayetinde belirsiz ve şekilsiz, maddi ve metodolojik sınırlara yer verdiği ortaya konmuştur. Karşılaştırmalı sosyal politika yalnızca büyümekle kalmamıştır, yaklaşık son otuz yılda muazzam bir şekilde, sınırlarını da genişleterek yayılım göstermiştir. Yapılan bu çalışmada, sosyal bilimler alanında yaygın olarak kullanılan derleme çalışma modellerinden olan “belgesel kaynak derlemesi modeli” kullanılmıştır. Bu kapsamda öncelikli olarak konu ile ilgili olarak literatürde yer alan çalışmalara ulaşılmış, ulaşılan araştırma bulguları derlenerek rapor haline getirilmiştir. Yapılan literatür taramasının sonunda bu araştırmanın, literatürdeki boşluğu doldurması hedeflenmektedir.
Keywords
Abstract
In the title above, comparative social policy is intended to be defined. There is no clear definition of this topic in the dictionary. This is because there is no attempt to define it, the term in a space of one or two paragraphs does not correspond to the description. This is not only due to the difficulty in characterizing a compound term, but also because of the controversial nature of both elements. It can be considered as the focus of social policy and comparative approach. Is Social Politics an academic discipline or a field of study? Which specific programs should be seen as social policy and which should not be in these special programs? What is comparative social policy analysis and are strategies in social sciences different from other qualitative or quantitative research? Is there scientific research, explicitly or implicitly, that is not comparative in nature? In this study, some of the definitional problems to be included are mentioned. There is no comprehensive claim to explain what comparative sociability is, but rather a more established policy, it has been shown that entering into the practice of descriptive mapping puts the boundaries in place, and ultimately, it places ambiguous and formless, material and methodological boundaries. Comparative social policy has not only grown, but has expanded enormously over the last three decades, extending its borders. In this study, "documentary source compilation model", one of the compilation study models widely used in the field of social sciences, was used. In this context, studies in the literature on the subject were reached primarily, and the findings of the research were compiled and reported. At the end of the literature review, this research is aimed to fill the gap in the literature.
Keywords
- Abrahamson, Peter (1999), ‘The welfare modelling business’, Social Policy and Administration,33(4), 394–
- Abrahamson, Peter (1999), ‘The welfare modelling business’, Social Policy and Administration,33(4), 394– 415.
- Alber, Jens, Gøsta Esping-Andersen and Lee Rainwater (1987), ‘Studying the welfare state:issues andqueries’, in Meinolf Dierkes, H.A. Weiler and A. Berthoin Antal (eds), Comparative Policy Research, Aldershot: Gower.
- Alcock, Pete (1996), Social Policy in Britain. Themes and Issues, London: Macmillan.Bonoli, Giuliano (2000), The Politics of Pension Reform. Institutions and Policy Change in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bradshaw, Jonathan and David Piachaud (1980), Child Support in the European Community,London: Bedford Square Press.
- Bradshaw, Jonathan et al. (1993), ‘A comparative study of child support in fifteen countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 3(4), 255–72.
- Castles, Frank (1998), Comparative Public Policy. Patterns of Post-war Transformation, Cheltenham,UK and Lyme, USA: Edward Elgar.
- Clasen, Jochen (1994), Paying the Jobless. A Comparison of Unemployment Benefit Policies in Great Britain and Germany, Aldershot: Avebury.
- Clasen, Jochen (1999), ‘Introduction’, in Jochen Clasen (ed.), Comparative Social Policy:Concepts, Theories and Methods, Oxford: Blackwell.
- Clasen, Jochen and Richard Freeman, (ed.) (1994), Social Policy in Germany, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Cutright, P. (1965), ‘Political structure, economic development, and national social security programs’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 70, 537–50.
- Dominelli, L. (1990), Women across Countries. Feminist Comparative Social Policy, London:Harvester Ebbinghaus, Bernhard and Philip Manow (2001), Comparing Welfare Capitalism, London:Routledge.
- Erskine, Angus (1998), ‘The approaches and methods of social policy’, in Pete Alcock, Angus Erskine and Margaret May (eds), The Student’s Companion to Social Policy, Oxford: Blackwell.
- Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1993), ‘The comparative macro-sociology of welfare states’, in L.Moreno (ed.), Social Exchange and Welfare Development, Madrid: Consejo superior de investigaciones cientificas.
- Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (2000), ‘Two societies, one sociology, and no theory’, British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 59–77.
- Flora, Peter (ed.) (1986), Growth to Limits, Berlin: De Gruyter.
- Flora, Peter and Arnold Heidenheimer (eds) (1981), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
- Freeman, Richard (2000) The Politics of Health in Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Gallie, Duncan and Serge Paugam (2000), Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Markus Haverland (2002), ‘The new scholarship of the welfare state’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12(1), 43–51.
- Hantrais, Linda and Steen Mangen (eds) (1996), Cross-national Research Methods in the Social Sciences, London: Pinter.
- Heclo, Hugh (1974), Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance, New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Heidenheimer, Arnold J., Hugh Heclo and Carolyn Teich Adams (1990), Comparative Public Policy. The Politics of Social Choice in America, Europe, and Japan, 3rd edn, New York: St.Martin’s Press.
- Higgins, Joan (1986), ‘Comparative social policy’, The Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs,2(3), 221–42.
- Inkeles, Alex and Masamichi Sasaki (eds) (1996), Comparing Nations and Cultures. Readings in a Cross- disciplinary Perspective, London: Prentice Hall.
- Jones Finer, Catherine (1999), ‘Trends and developments in welfare states’, in Jochen Clasen(ed.), Comparative Social Policy: Concepts, Theories and Methods, Oxford: Blackwell.
- Jones, Catherine (1985), Patterns of Social Policy. An Introduction to Comparative Analysis, London: Tavistock Publications.
- Jones, M.A. (1990), The Australian Welfare State, London: Allen & Unwin.
- Kaim-Caudle, Peter R. (1973), Comparative Social Policy and Social Security: A Ten-country Study, London: Martin Robertson.
- Kautto, Mikko, Johan Fritzell, Bjørn Hvinden, Jon Kvist and Hannu Uusitalo (eds) (2001),Nordic Welfare States in the European Context, London: Routledge.
- Kohn, Melvin L. (ed.) (1989), Cross-national Research in Sociology, Newbury Park: Sage.Landman, T. (2000), Issues and Methods on Comparative Politics, London: Routledge.
- Leichter, H. (1977), ‘Comparative Public Policy: Problems and Prospects’, The Policy Studies Journal, vol. 5, 583–96.
- Lessenich, Stephan and Illona Ostner (eds) (1998), Welten des Wohlfahrtskapitalismus. Der Sozialstaat in Vergleichender Perspektive, Frankfurt: Campus.
- MacPherson, Stewart and James Midgley (1987), Comparative Social Policy and the Third World, Sussex: Mitchell, Deborah (1991), Income Transfers in Ten Welfare States, Aldershot: Avebury.
- Olsson, Sven E. (1990), Social Policy and the Welfare State in Sweden, Stockholm: Arkiv.
- Øyen, Else (ed.) (1990), Comparative Methodology: Theory and Practice in International Social Research, London: Sage.
- Pierson, Chris (1998), Beyond the Welfare State? The New Political Economy of Welfare, 2nd edn, Oxford: Polity Press.
- Pierson, Paul (ed.) (2001), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ragin, Charles (1987), The Comparative Method, Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Ragin, Charles (1991), Issues and Alternatives in Comparative Social Research, Leiden: Brill.
- Rodgers, Barbara with Abraham Doron and M. Jones (1979), The Study of Social Policy: A Comparative Approach, London: George Allen & Unwin.
- Rodgers, Barbara, J. Greve and J.S. Morgan (1968), Comparative Social Administration, London:George Allen & Unwin.
- Rose, Richard (1995), ‘Making progress and catching up: comparative analysis for social policy-making’, International Social Science Journal, vol. 143, March, 113–25.
- Sainsbury, Diane (2001), ‘Welfare state challenges and responses: institutional and ideological resilience or restructuring?’, Acta Sociologica, vol. 44, 257–69.
- Shalev, Michael (1983), ‘The Social Democratic model and beyond’, Comparative Social Research, vol. 6, 315–51.
- Spicker, Paul (1995), Social Policy. Themes and Approaches, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Titmuss, Richard M. (1974), Social Policy, London: Allen & Unwin.van Kersbergen, Kees (1995), Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State, London: Routledge.
- Walker, Robert, Roger Lawson and Peter Townsend (1983), Responses to Poverty in Europe, London: Heinemann.
- Wilensky, Harald L. (1975), The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditure, Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Wilensky, Harald L., Gregory M. Luebbert, Susan Reed Hahn and Adrienne M. Jamieson (1985), Comparative Social Policy. Theories, Methods, Findings, Berkeley: University of California.
- Wilensky, Harald L., Gregory M. Luebbert, Susan Reed Hahn and Adrienne M. Jamieson (1987),‘Comparative social policy. Theories, methods, findings, (abridged version of Wilensky et al., 1985) in Meinolf Dierkes et al. (eds), Comparative Policy Research, London: Gower
