HAVAYOLU İŞ MODELLERİNİN YAN GELİRLER AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2021-40
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 48-60
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Havayolu endüstrisinde karlılık, ulusal ve uluslararası etkenlerden kolay bir şekilde etkilenilmesi, yüksek maliyetler ve ağır rekabet koşullarının olması nedeniyle düşük düzeylerde gerçekleşmektedir. Havayolu pazarına, düşük maliyetli taşıyıcıların girmeye başlaması rekabet şartlarını değiştirmeye başlamıştır. Düşük maliyetli taşıyıcılar, maliyetleri düşürmelerine ek olarak daha önce kullanılmayan gelir kaynaklarını kullanarak havayolu pazarında yan gelir kavramının ortaya çıkmasını sağlamıştır. Havayolu şirketleri, yan gelirler elde ederek toplam gelirlerini ve karlarını artırmak için gelir yönetimi sistemini kullanmaktadırlar. Bu sistem, şirketlerin gelirlerini ve kar oranlarını artırarak havayolu pazarındaki rekabet edebilirliğini artırmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu çalışmada, yan gelirlerini 2010-2018 yılları arasında açıklayan 25 havayolu şirketinin verileri eğilim yüzdeleri/trend analizi yöntemi ile analiz edildikten sonra değerlendirilmiştir. Verileri analiz edilen havayolu şirketlerinden 23 şirketin yan gelirlerini artırdığı 2 şirketin ise yan gelirlerinde azalma olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Farklı havayolu iş modelleri ile faaliyet gösteren havayolu şirketlerinin yan gelirlerini artırmaları, tüm iş modelleri için yan gelirlerin önemli bir gelir kaynağı olduğunu göstermektedir.

Keywords

Abstract

The profitability in the airline industry is at low levels due to the fact that it is easily affected by national and international factors, high costs and severe competition conditions. As low-cost carriers began to enter the airline market, the conditions of competition began to change. In addition to lowering costs, low-cost carriers have enabled the concept of ancillary income in the airline market by using previously unused revenue sources. Airline companies use the revenue management system to increase their total revenues and profits by earning side income. This system aims to increase the competitiveness of companies in the airline market by increasing their income and profit rates. In this study, the data of 25 airline companies, which announced their ancillary revenues between 2010 and 2018, were evaluated after analyzing with trend percentages / trend analysis method. Among the airline companies whose data were analyzed, it was concluded that 23 companies increased their ancillary revenues and 2 companies decreased their ancillary revenues. Increasing ancillary revenues of companies operating with different airline business models indicates that ancillary revenues are an important source of income for all business models.

Keywords


  • Akcanlı, F., Soba, M. ve Kestane, A. (2013). İMKB’ye kote edilmiş havayolu taşimaciliği sektöründe trend

  • Akcanlı, F., Soba, M. ve Kestane, A. (2013). İMKB’ye kote edilmiş havayolu taşimaciliği sektöründe trend analizine ilişkin örnek bir uygulama. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(3), 191-207.

  • Anderson, C., Davison, M. and Rasmussen, H. (2004). Revenue management: A real options approach. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 51(5), 686-703.

  • Avram, B. (2017a). Ancillaries in the aviation industry. Importance, trends, going digital. Expert Journal of Marketing, 5(2), 53-65.

  • Avram, B. (2017b). The hybrid airline model. Generating quality for passengers. Expert Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 149-154.

  • Başol, S. (2012). Havayolu yönetimi. Bursa: Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım.

  • Belobaba, P., Amedeo O. and Cynthia B. (2009). The global airline industry. İngiltere: A John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Publication.

  • Bhat, S. (2008). Financial management: Principles and practice. India: Excel Books

  • Bieger, T. and Wittmer, A. (2011). Airline strategy from network management to business models. In Aviation Systems, (pp. 77-102).

  • Bieger, T., Döring, T. and Laesser, C. (2002). Transformation of business models in the airline industry– impact on tourism. In Air transport and tourism, 52nd Congress (pp. 49-83).

  • Brigham, E. (2002). Financial management: Theory and practice. South-Western, Thomson Learning, 1184.Cross, R. G. (1997). Revenue management hard-core tactics for market domination. New York. USA: Broadway Books.

  • de Boer, E. R. and Gudmundsson, S. V. (2012). 30 years of frequent flyer programs. Journal of Air Transport Management, 24, 18-24.

  • Dufour, R. M. (2010). Integrated real-time ancillary revenue optimization system. U.S. Patent Application No. 12/397,200.

  • Gillen, D. (2006). Airline business models and networks: Regulation, competition and evolution in aviation markets. Review of Network economics, 5(4).

  • Gillen, D. and Morrison, W. G. (2005). Regulation, competition and network evolution in aviation. Journal of Air Transport Management, 11(3), 161-174.

  • Hanlon, P. (2006). Global airlines. Londra, İngiltere: Routledge.

  • Hao Eric, (2011). Ancillary revenues in the airline industry: Impacts on revenue management anddistribution systems. (Yüksek lisans tezi). University of California, USA: Massachusetts Instıtute of Technology, California.

  • Hoszman, A. (2015). Typology of ancillary revenue in airlines. Journal of Management and Financial Sciences, 8(22), 57-68.

  • IdeaWorks. (2012). Erişim adresi https://www.ideaworkscompany.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Press- Release-81A-Ancillary-Revenue-Results.pdf Erişim tarihi: 17.08.2019.

  • IdeaWorks.(2018). Erişim adresi https://www.ideaworkscompany.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/2018- Ancillary-Revenue-Yearbook-R.pdf Erişim tarihi: 12.05.2019,

  • Kargin, M. ve Aktas, R. (2011). Türkiye muhasebe standartlarina göre raporlanmis nakit akis tablosu ve analizi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, (52).

  • O’Connell, J. F. and GeorGe W. (2011). Air transport in the 21st century. New York, USA: Routledge.

  • O’Connell, J. F. and Williams, G. (2005). Passengers perceptions of low cost airlines and full servicecarriers: A case study involving Ryanair, Aer Lingus, Air Asia and Malaysia Airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 11(4): 259-272.

  • Peksatıcı, Ö. (2016). Ancillary revenue opportunities in Turkish domestic aviation market. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 4(1): 175-206.

  • Şengür, F. K., Ustaömer, T. C. ve Uzgör, M. (2017). A research on ancillary product buying intentions of domestic airline passengers in Turkey. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 4(4): 456-464.

  • Štimac, I., Vince, D. and Vidović, A. (2012). Effect of economic crisis on the changes of low-cost carriers business models. In 15th International Conference on Transport Science ICTS 2012, 1-12.

  • Strauss, A. K., Klein, R. and Steinhardt, C. (2018). A review of choice-based revenue management: Theory and methods”. European Journal of Operational Research, 271(2): 375-387.

  • Şengür, F. K. ve Şengür, Y. (2017). Havayolu iş modelleri: Kavramsal bir analiz. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, İzmir, Turkey

  • Şengür, F. K., Uzgör, M. ve Ustaömer, T. C. (2018). A research on Turkish internatıonal passengers'intention in purchasing airline ancillaries”. Transport ve Logistics, 18(44).

  • Vidović, A., Štimac, I. and Vince, D. (2013). Development of business models of low-cost airlines. ijtte- International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 3(1): 69-81.

  • Warnock-Smith, D., O'Connell, J. F. and Maleki, M. (2015). An examination of ongoing trends in airline ancillary revenues. In: 19th Air Transport Research Society World Conference.

  • Warnock-Smith, D., O'Connell, J. F. and Maleki, M. (2017). An analysis of ongoing trends in airline ancillary revenues. Journal of Air Transport Management, 64, 42-54.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics