Post Imperial Experience Of National Building On The Post-Soviet Territory (An Example Of Kazakhstan)
Author :
Abstract
This article gives the detailed analysis about the experience of national rebuilding of Kazakhstan after dissolution of the Soviet empire in the Post-Soviet territorial conditions. And it became actual issue in terms of experience of the Republic of Kazakhstan. About the former Soviet republics under the imperial experience of national development, the following phenomena are considered in the article. Firstly, the national policy of the Soviet Union is the continuity of many elements of an ethnic course of Russian empire. Secondly, it was the circumstance which dissolved the Soviet Union and because of opposition of its non-Russian ethnic groups to imperial character of the Soviet national policy, consciousness of Russian ethnic groups, its leadership in social structure of the Soviet there reveled new research aspects. Accordingly, the attempt of designing of the nations is realized by post-imperial experience of national building in article on the post-Soviet territory in conditions of "a post imperial syndrome» of Russian Diaspora. All these phenomena were most distinctly shown in experience of national building of Kazakhstan after its independence. The purpose of the article is to analyze the post imperial syndrome in the republic of Kazakhstan and Russian influence is one of the primary factors of interfering national consolidation of the Kazakh society for the development in its interethnic harmony.
Keywords
Abstract
This article gives the detailed analysis about the experience of national rebuilding of Kazakhstan after dissolution of the Soviet empire in the Post-Soviet territorial conditions. And it became actual issue in terms of experience of the Republic of Kazakhstan. About the former Soviet republics under the imperial experience of national development, the following phenomena are considered in the article. Firstly, the national policy of the Soviet Union is the continuity of many elements of an ethnic course of Russian empire. Secondly, it was the circumstance which dissolved the Soviet Union and because of opposition of its non-Russian ethnic groups to imperial character of the Soviet national policy, consciousness of Russian ethnic groups, its leadership in social structure of the Soviet there reveled new research aspects. Accordingly, the attempt of designing of the nations is realized by post-imperial experience of national building in article on the post-Soviet territory in conditions of "a post imperial syndrome» of Russian Diaspora. All these phenomena were most distinctly shown in experience of national building of Kazakhstan after its independence. The purpose of the article is to analyze the post imperial syndrome in the republic of Kazakhstan and Russian influence is one of the primary factors of interfering national consolidation of the Kazakh society for the development in its interethnic harmony.
Keywords
- 1. Aliyarov, E.K., Mamiraimov, T.K 2010. Inter-ethnic situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan: dynamics and trends in Kazakhstan: an annual report on the development of society and state (in 2009). Almaty
- 2. Aliyarov, E.K., Mamiraimov, T.K. 2011. ‘Understanding ‘language’. The analysis of a government program on the development of the Kazakh language’, in Kazakhstan: the annual report on society and state development (in 2009). Almaty; Mamiraimov, T.K., Belgibaev, S.T 2010. ‘Language politics in the Republic of Kazakhstan: purposes and forecasts’, in Civil Foresight: a prospect in the future of Kazakhstan. Almaty
- 3. Analytic report. 2011. Twenty years of reforms in the eyes of Russians (experience of long-term sociological gaugings). Moscow: Institute of sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- 4. Becker, S. 2000. ‘Russia and the Concept of Empire’, AbImperio 3-4: 329-342
- 5. Cohen, С. 2007. ‘the Question of questions»: why was there no Soviet Union’ (Translated from English). Moscow: АEРО-XXI.
- 6. Darwin, J. 2010. ‘Empire and ethnicity’. Nations and Nationalism 16, 3: 383-401
- 7. Diky, A. 1994. Jews in Russia and in the USSR. Novosibirsk: Ringing of church bells
- 8. Gatagova, L.C. 2003. ‘Crystallization of ethnic identity in the course of mass ethno phobias in Russian empire (2nd half XIX century)’, in M.T.Stepanjants (eds.) Religion and identity in Russia. Moscow: Eastern literature
- 9. Gudkov L. 2004. The negative identity. Moscow: the new literary review
- 11. Inglehart, Р.,Veltsel, K. 2011. Modernization, cultural changes and democracy: the human development sequence. (Translated from English). Мoscow: New publishing house
- 12. Kalabekov,E.G. 2010. ‘National Population Composition’, in Kalabekov,E.G. Russia and the Baltic states: Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia.available at http://kaig.ru/bal/nation95.pdf
- 13. Kappeler, A. 1997. Russia – multinational empire. Occurrence. History. Disintegration. Moscow: Progress-tradition.
- 14. Kharitonova, Н. 2008. ‘In search of national idea’, available athttp://www.ia- centr.ru/expert/1593 accessed on the 9th of July 2008.
- 15. Kozhevnikova G. 2006. ‘Radical nationalism in Russia and its counteraction’, contents in A.Verhovsky (eds.), Russian nationalism: ideology and mood. Moscow: Owl.
- 16. Krysko, V. 2002. Ethnic psychology and ethnic relations: a course of lectures. Moscow: Exam
- 17. Kuznetsova, A.B. 2005. Ethno political processes in Checheno-Ingush АSSR in 1957-1990: consequences of deportation and the basic aspects of rehabilitation of Chechens and Ingushs. The dissertation on scientific degree competition institute of Sciences. Moscow.
- 18. Mark von Hagen. 2004. ‘Empires, suburbs and Diasporas. Eurasia as an antiparadigm for the Post-Soviet period’, by Gerasimov I.V., Glebov S.V., Kaplunovsky A.P., (eds.), New imperial history of the post-Soviet territory. Kazan: the Center of researches of Nationalism and Empire
- 19. Murtuzaliyev, S.I. 2010. Problem of identity of Caucasians and Russians. Makhachkala: Formatand religious identity in modern Russia. Moscow: Publishing house of Institute of sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences Set of Laws of the Russian Empire. 1857. Tom the ninth. Saint- Petersburg: The typography of the second section in its own Imperial Majesty Office
- 21. Sherbakova, D.I. 2009. Stereotypes in the Russian-Chechen relations. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing house
- 22. Shumilova, E.A., Khodjaeva, E.A. 2006. ‘Feature of formation of the Russian civil identity of Moslems in Tatarstan’, in Magun, V.S. (eds.), Civil, ethnic and religious identity in modern Russia. Moscow: Publishing house of Institute of sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- 23. Sikevich, Z.V. 1999. Sociology and psychology of national relations. Saint-Petersburg: V.A. Mihajlova’s publishing house
- 24. Smith, A.D. 2004. Nationalism and modernism, in Smirnova A.V., Filippova J.M., Zagashvili E.S. (eds.), (translated from English). Мoscow: Praxis
- 25. Sushi, R. 2004. ‘Empire dialectics. Russia and Soviet Union’, in Gerasimov I.V., Glebov S.V., Kaplunovsky A.P., (eds.), New imperial history of the post-Soviet territory. Kazan: the Center of researches of Nationalism and Empire
- 26. Teploukhova, M.V. 2011. ‘Ethnonational policy in Russian empire XIX – the beginnings of XX centuries’, EcumeneMagazine. Nakhodka: The Vladivostok state university of economy and service, findings 2: 139-144
- 27. The doctrine of national unity of Kazakhstan. 2010. Astana
- 28. Vasilev, M. (eds.). 2001. Islam in Russian empire: Acts, descriptions,statistics. Moscow: Academy books
- 29. Vorozheykina, T.E. 2001. ‘The State and a society in Russia and Latin America’, Journal Social studies and the present 6: 5-26
- 30. Zaionchovsky, P A 1970.Russian autocracy in the end of XIX century. Political reaction 80 - the beginnings of 90th years.Moscow:Thoughts
- 31. Zimovina, E.P. 2003. ‘Dynamics of number and structure of the population of Kazakhstan in the second half of the 20th century’, Demoskop Weekly, 3 - 16 March.
- 32. Zvereva, G. 2005. ‘Nationalistic discourse and network culture’, Pro et contra 2 (29): 25-40
