Knowledge Management Capability, Entrepreneurial Strategy Making Capability and Organizational Effectiveness: Evidence from Turkey

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-10
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 208-227
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı organizasyonlarda bilgi yönetim yeteneği ve organizasyonel etkililik arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu ilişkide girişimcilik stratejisi geliştirme yeteneğinin aracılık etkisini araştırmaktır. Türkiye’de mevcut ve faal durumda olan 18 serbest bölgedeki üretim, patent ve Ar-Ge çalışması yaparak hali hazırda faaliyetlerine devam eden inovatif-girişimci işletmeler bu çalışmanın evrenini oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında 311 işletmeye mail yoluyla anket gönderilmiştir. Elde edilen bu veriler LISREL 8.8. programı kullanılarak yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (YEM) ile analiz edilmiştir. Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi sonucunda, organizasyonel etkililik ile bilgi yönetimi arasındaki ilişki ampirik olarak kanıtlanmakla beraber, girişimcilik stratejisi geliştirme yeteneğinin bilgi yönetimi ile organizasyonel etkililik arasında aracılık etkisine sahip olduğu saptanmı

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between knowledge management capabilities and organizational effectiveness in organizations and the mediating effect of entrepreneurial strategy making capability in this relationship. The universe of this study is constituted by innovative-entrepreneurial businesses, launched in 18 active free zones in Turkey that are currently operating and having R&D activities. A survey was conducted and a sample of 206 organizations was analyzed using path analysis with LISREL 8.8. Software. As a result, the relationship between organizational effectiveness and knowledge management capabilities has been empirically proven; additionally, it has been found that the entrepreneurial strategy making capability has a mediating effect between knowledge management capabilities and organizational effectiveness.

Keywords


  • Abston, K.A. and Stout, J.V. (2006), ‘‘Organizational effectiveness: exploring what it means in

  • Abston, K.A. and Stout, J.V. (2006), ‘‘Organizational effectiveness: exploring what it means in human resource development’’ available at:

  • https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492748.pdf (accessed 2016 May 20).Argote, L. and Ingram, P. (2000), ‘‘Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms’’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.82 No: 1, pp.150–169.

  • Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. (2001), ‘‘Review: knowledge management and knowledge managementsystems: conceptual foundations and research issues’’, MIS Quarterly, Vol.25, No: 1, pp.107–136.

  • Armistead, C. (1999), ‘‘Knowledge management and process performance’’, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.3, No: 2, pp. 143-154.

  • Aslan, S. and Ozata, M. (2007), ‘‘ Kobi’lerde bilgi teknolojisi kullaniminin, rekabet gücü,yenilikçilik, girişimcilik ve pazarlama kapasitesiyle ilişkileri: otomotiv sektöründe bir araştirma’’, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Vol.16, No: 2, pp. 15-28.

  • Barney, J.B. (1991), ‘‘Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage’’, Journal of Management, Vol.17, No:1, pp. 99-120.

  • Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986),‘‘ The moderator- mediator variable distinction in socialpsychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations’’, Journal of Personality and Social Psycholgy, Vol.51, No: 6, pp. 1173-1182.

  • Barquin, R.C., Bennet, A. and Remez, S.G. (2001), Knowledge management: the catalyst for e- government, Management Concepts, Inc., Vienna, VA.

  • Bohn, R.E. (1994), ‘‘Measuring and managing technological knowledge’’, Sloan Management Review, Vol.36, No: 1, pp. 61-73.

  • Broadbent, M. (1998), ‘‘ The phenomenon of knowledge management: what does it mean to the information profession? ‘’, Information Outlook, Vol.2, No: 5, pp. 23-33.

  • Byrne,B. (2010), Structural equation modeling with amos: basic concepts, applications, and programming, Routledge, New York, NY.

  • Cakar, D., Yıldız, S. and Dur. S. (2008), ‘‘ Bilgi yönetimi ve örgütsel etkinlik ilişkisi: örgüt kültürü ve örgüt yapisinin temel etkileri’’, Ege Academic Review, Vol:10, No:1, pp. 71-93.

  • Chang, T.C. and Chuang, S.H. (2011), ‘‘Performance implications of knowledge managementprocesses: examining the roles of infrastructure capability and business strategy’’, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.38, No: 5, pp. 6170-6178.

  • Clarke, T. (2001), ‘‘The knowledge economy’’, Education & Training, Vol. 43, No: 4/5, pp. 189-Cokluk, Ö., Sekercioğlu, G. and Büyüköztürk, S. (2010), Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: spss ve lisrel uygulamalari, Pegem Akademi. İstanbul.

  • Covin, J.G. and Slevin, D.P. (1989), ‘‘Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environment’’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.10, No: 1, pp. 75-81.

  • Darroch, J. (2005), ‘‘Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance’’, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9, No: 3, pp.101-115.

  • Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1998), Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

  • DeTienne, K.B., Dyer, G., Hoopes, C. and Harris, S. (2004),‘‘ Toward a model of effectiveknowledge management and directions for future research: culture, leadership, and ckos ‘’, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol.10, No: 4, pp. 26-43.

  • Dess, G.G., Lumpkin, G.T. and Covin, J.G. (1997), ‘‘Entrepreneurial strategy making and firmperformance: tests of contingency and configurational models’’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, No: 9, pp. 677-695.

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. and Martin, J.A. (2000), ‘‘ Dynamic capabilities: what are they?’’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, No:10/11, pp. 1105–1121.

  • Emadzade, M.K., Mashayekhi, B. and Abdar, E. (2012), ‘‘Knowledge management capabilities andorganizational performance’’, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, Vol. 3, No: 11, pp. 781-790.

  • Felton, S.M. (2002), ‘‘Knowledge is capital, the rest is just money’’, Strategy and Leadership, Vol.30, No:3, pp. 41-42.

  • Gefen, D., Sttraub, D.W. and Boudreau, M. (2000), ‘‘Structured equation model and regression:guidleness for research practice’’, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol.4, No:7, pp. 1-78.

  • Georgopoulos, B.S. and Tannenbaum, A.S. (1957), ‘‘A study of organizational effectivenes’’, American Sociological Review, Vol.22, No: 5, pp. 1-16.

  • Germain, R., Droge, C. and Christensen, W. (2001), ‘‘The mediating role of operations knowledgein the relationship of context with performance’’, Journal of Operations Management, Vol.19, pp. 453–469.

  • Gloet, M. and Berrel, M. (2003),‘‘The dual paradigm nature of knowledge management: implicationsfor achieving quality outcomes in human resource management’’, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.7, No:1, pp. 78-89.

  • Gold, A.H., Malhotra, A. and Segars, A.H. (2001), ‘‘Knowledge management: an organizationalcapabilities perspective’’, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18, No:1, pp.185-214.

  • Grant, R.M. (1991), ‘‘The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implication for strategy formulation’’, California Management Review, Vol. 33, No: 3, pp. 114-135.

  • Grant, R.M. and Baden-Fuller, C. (1995), ‘‘A knowledge-based theory of inter-firm collaboration’’, Academy of Management Journal Best Paper Proceedings, 1995(1): 17-21.

  • Grant, R.M. (1996a), ‘‘Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm’’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17(special issue) , pp. 109-122.

  • Grant, R.M. (1996b), ‘‘Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration’’, Organization Science, Vol.7, No:4, pp. 375–387.

  • Grover, N. and Davenport, T.H. (2001), ‘‘General perspectives on knowledge management: fostering a research agenda’’, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18, No: 1, pp. 5-21.

  • Hall, R. (1991), ‘‘The contribution of intangible resources to business success’’, Journal of General Management, Vol.16, No: 4, pp. 41-52.

  • Helfat, C.E. and Peteraf, M.A. (2003), ‘‘The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles’’, Strategic Management, Vol.24, No:10, pp. 997-1010.

  • Henderson, J.C. and Venkatraman, N. (1999), ‘‘Strategic alignment: leveraging informationtechnology for transforming organizations’’, IBM Systems Journal, Vol.32, No:1, pp. 472-484.

  • Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp,S.M. and Sexton, D.L.(2001),‘‘Entrepreneurıal strategies for wealth creation’’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, pp. 479-491.

  • Holsapple, C.W. and , Joshi, K.D. (2000), ‘‘an investigation of factors that influence the managementof knowledge in organization’’, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol: 9, No:2/3, pp. 235-Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M. (2008), ‘‘Structural equation modelling: guedelines for determining model fit’’, Electronic Journal on Business Research, Vol.6, No:1, No: 53-59.

  • Janson, M.A. and Wrycza, S. (1999), “Information technology and entrepreneurship: three cases from Poland”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol.19, No:5, pp. 351–367.

  • Jasimuddin, S.M. and Zhang, Z.J. (2014), ‘‘Knowledge management strategy and organizational culture’’, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol.65, No:10, pp. 1490-1500.

  • Jennex, M.E. and Olfman, L. (2005),‘‘Assessing knowledge management success’’, International Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.1, No: 2, pp. 33–49.

  • Jain, R.K. and Triandis, H.C. (1997), Management of Research and Development Organizations: Managing The Unmanageable, John Wiley & Sons. Inc., NewYork NY.

  • Kline, R.B. (2015), Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, Guilford Publications, New York, NY.

  • Krogh, G.V., Ichıj, K. and Nonaka, I. (2002), Bilginin Üretimi, Rota yayınları, İstanbul.

  • Lam, W. and Chua, A. (2005). ‘‘Knowledge management dynamic abandonment: an exploratoryexamination of root causes’’, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol.16, No: 35, pp. 723-743.

  • Lee,H. and Choi, B. (2003), ‘‘Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizationalperformance: an integrative view and empirical examination’’, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 20, No:1, pp. 179-228.

  • Lee,K and Lim, C. (2001), 'Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: the findings from Korean industries’’, Research Policy, Vol.30, No: 3, pp. 459-483.

  • Leonard, D. (1995), Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the source of innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA.

  • Li, H., Yan, Z. and Tsang-Sing, C. (2005), ‘’Entrepreneurial strategy making and performance inChina’s new technology ventures – contingency effect of environments and firm competences’’, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol.16 , No: 1, pp. 7-57.

  • Liao,S., Fei, W.C. and Chen, C.C. (2007).‘‘Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovationcapability: an empirical study of Taiwan’s knowledge-intensive industries’’, Journal of Information Science, Vol.33, No: 3, pp. 340–359.

  • Liu, P.L., Chen, W.C. and Tsai, C.H. (2004), ‘‘an empirical study on the correlation betweenknowledge management capability and competitiveness in Taiwan’s industries’’, Technovation, Vol.24, No: 12, pp. 971-977.

  • Maier, R. and Ramus, U. (2002), ‘‘Defining process- oriented knowledge management strategies’’, Knowledge and Process Management , Vol.9 , No:2, pp. 103-118.

  • McEvily, S.K. and Chakravarthy, B. (2002),‘‘The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: anempirical test for product performance and technological knowledge’’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.23, No: 4, pp. 285-305.

  • McKenna, R. (1999), New Management, McGraw-Hill, Sydney, NSW.Medsker, G.J., Williams, L.J. and Holahan, P.J. (1994), ‘‘A review of current practices for evaluatingcausal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research’’, Journal of Management, Vol. 20. No: 2, pp. 43–64.

  • Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C.,Meyer, A.D. and Coleman, H.J. (1978), ‘‘Organizational strategy, structure and processes’’, Academy of Management Review, Vol.3, No:3, pp. 546-562.

  • Miller,D. (1983),‘‘The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms’’, Management Science, Vol.29, No:7, pp. 770–791.

  • Miller, D. and Friesen, P. (1983), ‘‘Strategy-making and environment: the third link’’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.4, No: 3, pp. 221-235.

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973), ‘‘Strategy-making in three modes’’, California Management Review, Vol.16, No: 2, pp. 44-52.

  • Miranda, S.M., Lee, J.N. and Lee, J.H. (2011), ‘‘Stocks and flows underlying organizations’knowledge management capability: synergistic versus contingent complementarities over time‘’, Information and Management, Vol.48, No: 8, pp. 382-392.

  • Mott, P.E. (1972),‘‘The characteristics of effective organizations’’, Harper & Row., New York, NY.Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The knowledge creation company: how japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

  • Ofek, E. and Sarvary, M. (2001),‘‘Leveraging the customer base: creating competitive advantagethrough knowledge management’’, Management Science Informs, Vol.47, No: 11, pp. 1441–1456

  • Peachey, T. and Hall, D. editors. 2005. IEEE 2005. Knowledge Management and the Leading ISJournals: An Analysis of Trends and Gaps in Published. Paper presented at the 38th HawaiiInternational Conference on System Sciences, Jan 6, Big Island, HI. available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1385764/

  • Penrose, E.T. (1959), The theory of the growth of the firm, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, EN.

  • Porter-Libskind, J. (1996), ‘‘Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm’’. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No: S2, pp. 93-107.

  • Probst, G., Buchel, B. and Raub, S. (1998), Knowledge as a Strategic Resource. In: Krogh, G.V.,Ross, J. and Kleine, D. Knowing in firms: understanding, managing and measuring knowledge, Sage, London EN., pp. 240-252.

  • Sabherwal, R. and Chan, Y.E. (2001), ‘‘Alignment between business and is strategies: a study ofprospectors, analyzers, and defenders’’, Information Systems Research, Vol.12, No: 1, pp. 11-33.

  • Sanchez, R. and Mahoney, J.T. (1996), ‘‘Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design’’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, pp. 63-76.

  • Schumacker, R.E. and Lomax, R.G. (1996), A beginner’s guide to SEM, Lawrence, Mahwah,NJ.

  • Sher, P.J. and Lee, V.C. (2004),‘‘ Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamiccapabilities through knowledge management’’, Information & Management, Vol.41, No:8, pp. 933-Skyrme, D. (1997), Knowledge networking: creating the collaborative enterprise, Butterworth- Heinemann, Boston, MA.

  • Smith, T.A. (2006), ‘‘Knowledge management and its capabilities linked to the business strategy for organizational effectiveness’’(dissertation), Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL.

  • Stein, E.W. and Zwass, V. (1995), ‘‘Actualizing organizational memory with information systems’’, Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No: 2, pp. 85-117.

  • Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell L.S. and Osterlind, S.J. (2001), Using multivariate statistics, Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education, Boston, MA.

  • Taego, K.T., Gyehee, L. and Seunggil, L. (2012) ‘‘Social capital, knowledge sharing andorganizational performance: what structural relationship do they have in hotels?’’, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol.25, No: 5, pp. 683-704.

  • Teece, D.J., Gary, P. and Shuen, A. (1997) ‘‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, No: 7, pp. 504-535.

  • Thompson, D.G. 2009. ‘‘The Impact of Organizational Performance Measures on ProjectManagement Institute’s Nine Knowledge Areas: An Exploratory Study of Project Managers’ Perceptions’’(dissertation), Capella University, Minneapolis, MN.

  • Tiwana, A., (2003), Bilginin Yönetimi, Dışbank Kitapları, İstanbul.

  • Tufan, C. (2009), ‘‘Türkiye’de Serbest Bölgelerin Performansında Bürokrasinin Etkileri’’, (master’s thesis). Beykent University, İstanbul.

  • Tzortzaki, A.M. and Mihiotis, A. (2014), ‘‘A review of knowledge management theory and future directions’’, Knowledge and Process Management. Vol.21, No: 1, pp. 29-41.

  • Valmohammadi, C. and Ahmadi, M. (2015), ‘‘The impact of knowledge management practices onorganizational performance: a balanced scorecard approach’’, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol.28, No:1, pp.131-159.

  • Van Buren, M. (1999), ‘‘A yardstick for knowledge management’’, Training Development, Vol.53,Venkatraman, N. and Prescott, J. E. 1990. ‘‘Environment-strategy coalignment: an empirical test of its performance implications’’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.11, No: 1, pp. 1-23.

  • Verkasalo, M. and Lappalainen, P. (1998), ‘‘A method of measuring the efficiency of the knowledgeutilization process’’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.45, No: 4, pp. 414-423.

  • Villar, C., Alegre, J. and Pla-Barber, J. (2014), ‘‘exploring the role of knowledge managementpractices on exports: a dynamic capabilities view’’, International Business Review, Vol 23, No:1, pp. 38-44

  • Wade, M. and Hulland, J. (2004), ‘‘Review: the resource-based view and information systemsresearch: review, extension, and suggestions for future research management’’ Information Systems Quarterly, Vol.28, No: 1, pp. 107–142.

  • Zack, M.H. (1999). ‘‘Managing codified knowledge’’, Sloan Management Review, Vol.40, No: 4, pp. 45-58.

  • Zheng, W., Yang, B. and McLean, G.N. (2010), ‘‘Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy,and organizational effectiveness: mediating role of knowledge management’’. Journal of Business Research, Vol.63, pp. 763–771.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics