Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinde akademik başarı ve algılanan sosyal desteğin siber zorbalık (SZ) ve siber mağduriyet (SM) ile ilişkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışmanın örneklemini 550 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturdu.Her bir katılımcı Üniversite Öğrencileri için Revize Siber Zorbalık Envanteri, Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği ve sosyodemografik formunu doldurmuştur. Katılımcıların SZ ve SM puanları ile aile ve arkadaştan algılanan sosyal destek alt ölçek puanları arasında negatif yönde ilişki saptandı (sırasıyla r=-.23, r=-.12, r=-.23 ve r=-.34). Katılımcıların genel not ortalamları ile SZ ve SM puanları arasında negatif yönde korelasyon saptandı (sırasıyla r=-.38 ve r=-.52). Üniversite öğrencilerinde algılanan düşük sosyal destek ve düşük akademik başarı düzeyi hem SM hem de SZ ile ilişkili olabilir.
Keywords
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the relationship of academic achievement and perceived social support with cyberbullying (CB) and cybervictimization (CV) in university students. 550 university students completed the Revised Cyberbullying Inventory for University Students (RCBI), Multidimensional Scale for Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and a sociodemographic form. CB and CV scores were negatively correlated with MSPSS' family and friends subscale scores (r=-.23, r=-.12, r=-.23, and r=-.34, respectively). GPA level was negatively correlated with CB and CV scores (r=-.38 and r=-.52, respectively). Low perceived social support and low academic achievement level may be related to both CB and CV in university students.
@article{2022,title={Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Akademik Başarı İle Algılanan Sosyal Desteğin Siberzorbalık Ve Siber Mağduriyet İle İlişkisi},abstractNode={
Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinde akademik başarı ve algılanan sosyal desteğin siber zorbalık (SZ) ve siber mağduriyet (SM) ile ilişkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışmanın örneklemini 550 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturdu.Her bir katılımcı Üniversite Öğrencileri için Revize Siber Zorbalık Envanteri, Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği ve sosyodemografik formunu doldurmuştur. Katılımcıların SZ ve SM puanları ile aile ve arkadaştan algılanan sosyal destek alt ölçek puanları arasında negatif yönde ilişki saptandı (sırasıyla r=-.23, r=-.12, r=-.23 ve r=-.34). Katılımcıların genel not ortalamları ile SZ ve SM puanları arasında negatif yönde korelasyon saptandı (sırasıyla r=-.38 ve r=-.52). Üniversite öğrencilerinde algılanan düşük sosyal destek ve düşük akademik başarı düzeyi hem SM hem de SZ ile ilişkili olabilir.
Ayşegül YETKİN TEKİN-Ömer YILMAZ -Atilla TEKİN . 2022 . Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Akademik Başarı İle Algılanan Sosyal Desteğin Siberzorbalık Ve Siber Mağduriyet İle İlişkisi . SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL (SMART JOURNAL).DOI:10.29228/smryj.58302
Ayşegül YETKİN TEKİN-Ömer YILMAZ -Atilla TEKİN .(2022).Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Akademik Başarı İle Algılanan Sosyal Desteğin Siberzorbalık Ve Siber Mağduriyet İle İlişkisi.SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL (SMART JOURNAL)
Ayşegül YETKİN TEKİN-Ömer YILMAZ -Atilla TEKİN ,"Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Akademik Başarı İle Algılanan Sosyal Desteğin Siberzorbalık Ve Siber Mağduriyet İle İlişkisi" , SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL (SMART JOURNAL) (2022)
Ayşegül YETKİN TEKİN-Ömer YILMAZ -Atilla TEKİN . 2022 . Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Akademik Başarı İle Algılanan Sosyal Desteğin Siberzorbalık Ve Siber Mağduriyet İle İlişkisi . SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL (SMART JOURNAL) . 2022. DOI:10.29228/smryj.58302
Ayşegül YETKİN TEKİN-Ömer YILMAZ -Atilla TEKİN .Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Akademik Başarı İle Algılanan Sosyal Desteğin Siberzorbalık Ve Siber Mağduriyet İle İlişkisi. SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL (SMART JOURNAL) (2022)
Ayşegül YETKİN TEKİN-Ömer YILMAZ -Atilla TEKİN .Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Akademik Başarı İle Algılanan Sosyal Desteğin Siberzorbalık Ve Siber Mağduriyet İle İlişkisi. SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL (SMART JOURNAL) (2022)
Format:
Ayşegül YETKİN TEKİN-Ömer YILMAZ -Atilla TEKİN . (2022) .Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Akademik Başarı İle Algılanan Sosyal Desteğin Siberzorbalık Ve Siber Mağduriyet İle İlişkisi SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL (SMART JOURNAL)
Ayşegül YETKİN TEKİN-Ömer YILMAZ -Atilla TEKİN . Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Akademik Başarı İle Algılanan Sosyal Desteğin Siberzorbalık Ve Siber Mağduriyet İle İlişkisi . SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL (SMART JOURNAL) . 2022 doi:10.29228/smryj.58302
Ayşegül YETKİN TEKİN-Ömer YILMAZ -Atilla TEKİN ."Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Akademik Başarı İle Algılanan Sosyal Desteğin Siberzorbalık Ve Siber Mağduriyet İle İlişkisi",SOCIAL MENTALITY AND RESEARCHER THINKERS JOURNAL (SMART JOURNAL)(2022)
Akbulut, Y. & Eristi, B. (2011). Cyberbullying and victimisation among Turkish university students.
Akbulut, Y. & Eristi, B. (2011). Cyberbullying and victimisation among Turkish university students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1155- 1170. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.910
Alizamar, A., Syahputra, Y., Afdal, A., Ardi, Z., & Trizeta, L. (2018). Differences in aggressive behavior ofmale and female students using Rasch stacking. International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education, 3(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.24036/0051za0002
Alwagait, E., Shahzad, B., & Alim, S. (2015). Impact of social media usage on students academic performance in Saudi Arabia. Computers Human Behavior, 51, 1092-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.028
Arató, N., Zsidó, A. N., Rivnyák, A., Péley, B., & Lábadi, B. (2021). Risk and Protective Factors inCyberbullying: the Role of Family, Social Support and Emotion Regulation. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-021-00097-4.
Arriaga, P., & Aguiar, C. (2019). Gender differences in aggression: The role of displaying facial emotionalcues in a competitive situation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(5), 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12568
Björkqvist, K. (2018). Gender differences in aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.030
Bowes, L., B. Maughan, A. Caspi, T. E. Moffitt, & L. Arseneault. (2010). Families promote emotional andbehavioural resilience to bullying: Evidence of an environmental effect. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 51 (7):809-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02216.x
Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estévez, A., Villardón, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalitiesand aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017
Chan, H. C., & Wong, D. S. (2019). Traditional school bullying and cyberbullying perpetration: Examiningthe psychosocial characteristics of Hong Kong male and female adolescents. Youth & Society, 51(1), 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X16658053
Chu, T. Q., Kim, H. S., & Sherman, D. K. (2008). Culture and the perceptions of implicit and explicit socialsupport use. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Albuquerque, NM.
Eker, D., Arkar, H., & Yaldız, H. (2001). Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeği’nin Gözden Geçirilmiş Formunun Faktör Yapısı, Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 12(1), 17-25.
Elgar, F. J., A. Napoletano, G. Saul, M. A. Dirks, W. Craig, V. Paul Poteat, M. Holt, & B. W. Koenig. (2014).Cyberbullying victimization and mental health in adolescents and the moderating role of family dinners. JAMA Pediatrics, 168 (11):1015-22. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1223.
Fanti, K. A., Demetriou, A. G., & Hawa, V. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining riskand protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.643169
Hellfeldt, K., López-Romero, L., & Andershed, H. (2020). Cyberbullying and psychological well-being inyoung adolescence: the potential protective mediation effects of social support from family, friends, andteachers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010045
Holfeld, B., & Sukhawathanakul, P. (2017). Associations between internet attachment, cyber victimization,and internalizing symptoms among adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0194
Gardella, J. H., Fisher, B. W., & Teurbe-Tolon, A. R. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of cyber-victimization and educational outcomes for adolescents. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 283-308. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316689136
Ildırım, E., Çalıcı, C., & Erdoğan, B. (2017). Psychological Correlates of Cyberbullying and Cyber-Victimization. International Journal of Human and Behavioral Science, 3(2), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.19148/ijhbs.365829
Khoury-Kassabri, M., Mishna, F., & Massarwi, A. A. (2019). Cyberbullying perpetration by Arab youth: Thedirect and interactive role of individual, family, and neighborhood characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(12), 2498–2524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516660975
Konig, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Steffgen, G. (2010). Cyberbullying as an act of revenge?. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 20(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.210
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: Acritical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073-1137. DOI: 10.1037/a0035618
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullyingand traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health,53(1),13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jadohealth.2012.09.018
Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health , 41(6), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
Laftman, S. B., Modin, B., & Östberg, V. (2013). Cyberbullying and subjective health: A large - scale study ofstudents in Stcokholm Sweden. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(1), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.10.020
Lazuras, L., Barkuoukis, V., Ourda, D., & Tsorbatsoudis, H. (2013). A process model of cyberbullying in adolescence. Computers in Human Behavior , 29(3), 881-887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.015
Martínez-Martínez AM, López-Liria R, Aguilar-Parra JM, Trigueros R, Morales-Gázquez MJ, & Rocamora-Pérez P.(2020). Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Cybervictimization, and Academic Performancein Secondary School Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21):7717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217717
Mura, G., & Diamantini, D. (2013). Cyberbullying among Colombian students: An exploratoryinvestigation. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 3(3), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe3030022
Nakamoto, J., & Schwartz, D. (2010). Is peer victimization associated with academic achievement? A meta‐ analytic review. Social Development, 19(2), 221-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00539.x
Navarro, R., Yubero, S., & Larrañaga, E. (2015). Psychosocial risk factors for involvement in bullyingbehaviors: Empirical comparison between cyberbullying and social bullying victims and bullies. School Mental Health, 7(4), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-015-9157-9
Nocentini, A., Calmaestra, J., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Ortega, R., & Menesini, E. (2010).Cyberbullying: Labels, behaviours and definition in three European countries. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 20(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.129
Olenik-Shemesh, D., & Heiman, T. (2017). Cyberbullying victimization in adolescents as related to bodyesteem, social support, and social self-efficacy. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 178(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2016.1195331
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look atcyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288
Peled, Y. (2019). Cyberbullying and its influence on academic, social, and emotional development of undergraduate students. Heliyon, 5(3), e01393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01393
Pontzer, D. (2010). A theoretical test of bullying behavior: Parenting, personality, and the bully/victim relationship. Journal of Family Violence, 25(3), 259-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9289-5
Rice, E., Petering, R., Rhoades, H., Winetrobe, H., Goldbach, J., Plant, A., Montoya, J., & Kordic, T. (2015).Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization Among Middle-School Students. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3), e66. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302393
Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Göbel, K., Scheithauer, H., Brighi, A., Guarini, A., Tsorbatzoudis, H., Barkoukis,V., Pyzalski, J., Plichta, P., Del Rey, R., Casas, J.A., Thompson, F & Smith, P. K. (2015). A Comparison ofClassification Approaches for Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying Using Data from Six European Countries. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.961067
Shumaker, S. A., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 11-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01105.x
Sjursø, I. R., Fandrem, H., & Roland, E. (2016). Emotional problems in traditional and cybervictimization. Journal of School Violence, 15(1), 114-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.996718
Smith, P., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., & Tippett, N. (2006). An investigation into cyberbullying, its forms,awareness and impact, and the relationship between age and gender in cyberbullying. Research Brief No. RBX03-06. London: DfES.
Sorrentino, A., Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., & Blaya, C. (2019). Epidemiology of cyberbullying acrossEurope: Differences between countries and genders. Educational Sciences: Theory & Pratice , 19(2), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.2.005
Sun, S., & Fan, X. (2018). Is there a gender difference in cyber-victimization? A meta-analysis. Journal ofMedia Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 30(3), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864- 1105/a000185
Sun, S., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2016). Cyberbullying Perpetration A meta-Analysis of Gender Differences. International Journal Of Internet Science , 11(1), 61-81.
Tanrikulu, I., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2019). Motives Behind Cyberbullying Perpetration: A Test of Uses andGratifications Theory. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 4:886260518819882.Taylor, S. E., Sherman, D. K., Kim, H. S., Jarcho, J., Takagi, K., & Dunagan, M. S. (2004). Culture and socialsupport: Who seeks it and why? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 354 –362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.354
Tennant, J. E., Demaray, M. K., Coyle, S., & Malecki, C. K. (2015). The dangers of the web:Cybervictimization, depression, and social support in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 50,348-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.014
Topcu, Ç., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). The revised cyber bullying inventory (RCBI): Validity and reliabilitystudies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5,660-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.161
Truzoli, R., Viganò, C., Galmozzi, P. G., & Reed, P. (2020). Problematic internet use and study motivation inhigher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 480-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12414
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables:Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (p. 56–75). Sage Publications, Inc.
Wright, M. F. (2016). Cyber victimization on college campuses: Longitudinal associations with suicidalideation, depression, and anxiety. Criminal Justice Review, 41(2), 190-203.Worsley, J. D., McIntyre, J. C., & Corcoran, R. (2019). Cyberbullying victimisation and mental distress:testing the moderating role of attachment security, social support, and coping styles. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 24(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2018.1530497
Zimet, G., Farley, G. K., Dahlem, N. W., & Zimet, S. G. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of PerceivedSocial Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2Zsila, A., Urban, R., Griffiths, M. D., & Demetrovics, Z. (2019). Gender differences in the associationbetween cyberbullying victimization and perpetration: the role of anger rumination and traditional bullyingexperiences. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(5), 1252-1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9893-9
Zych, I., Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2019). Protective factors against bullying and cyberbullying: Asystematic review of meta-analyses. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.06.008