Success And Attitude Levels Of The Students, Who Had Attended And Had Not Attended Nursery School, In Science And Technology Lesson In Elementary School

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-11
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 449-457
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Ülkelerin dünyada gelişmişlik açısından ilk sırayı almasında fen ve teknolojinin önemi tartışılmazdır. Gelişmiş olan ülkeler öğrencilere okulöncesi eğitimde fen ve teknolojiyi sevdirme yoluna giderek, onların tabiat merakını gidermektedirler. Bu nedenle bu çalışma okul öncesi eğitimi alan öğrenci ile almayan öğrencilerin ilköğretimde fen ve teknolojiye karşı tutum ve başarı farkını araştırmaktadır. Materyal olarak çalışmada 3’lü Likert tipi tutum ölçek kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin başarısını tespit etmede, fen ve teknoloji derslerinden kaç puan aldıklarına ilişkin soru maddesi kullanılmıştır. Çalışma, Van merkezde öğrenim gören 190 tane 5. sınıf öğrencileri ile yürütülmüştür. Örneklemde elde edilen veriler analizinde, öğrencilerden anaokuluna gidenle gitmeyenlerin başarıları arasında bir farkın olup olmadığına ANOVA tekniği ile bakılmıştır. Anaokuluna gidenle gitmeyenin tutum puanları arasında farkın olup olmadığına, özel ve devlet okuluna gidenlerin başarıları ile tutumları arasında farkın olup olmadığına da Independent Samples Test (t- testi) tekniği kullanılmıştır. Okulöncesi eğitime giden öğrencilerin tutum ve başarılarında dikkate değer bir başarı görülmüştür. Ancak özel okulla devlet okulu arasında tutum ve başarı aşısından bir farka rastlanmamıştır. Ülkelerin geleceği açısından, öğrencilerin fen ve teknoloji dersinde başarılı olması, bilimsel bir tavır kazanması bekleniyorsa, her öğrencinin okulöncesi eğitime devam etmesi sağlanmalıdır.

Keywords

Abstract

In developed countries, the students’ curiosities about nature are satisfied by making them interested in science and technology in pre-school education. Therefore, this study examines the variations between attitude and success levels of the students in science and technology, who had had and not had pre-school education. 5-point Likert’s attitude scale was used as material. The students were asked that how much points they obtained in science and technology lessons for determining their success. The study was performed with 400 students studying fifth class of elementary school in center four cities in Turkey. In analyzing of the data, Independent Samples Test (t- test) was employed to determine whether there is a variance between successes of the students, who had attended and had not attended nursery school. Independent Samples Test (t- test) also was employed to determine whether there is a variance between attitude points of the students, who had attended and had not attended nursery school, and also success and attitudes between the students, who were attending private schools and state schools. A significant difference was seen between attitudes and success of the students, who had had and had not had pre-school education. Hence, every student attends pre-school education.

Keywords


  • Akman, B., (1994). Application examples and main technical of science-nature, play and material

  • Akman, B., (1994). Application examples and main technical of science-nature, play and materialstudies in preschool period, The handbook for preschool educators, Ya-Pa Turan offset, March, 63-Aktas Arnas, Y., (2002). Aims of science education in preschool period, Journal of Child Growing and Education, 6(7), 1-6, June- December.

  • Alisinanoglu, F., Ulutas, I., (2003) Roles in science and nature education of preschool teachers, Journal of New Education, 1(2), January, February and March.

  • Bal, S., (1993). Science studies in nursery school, 9th Ya-Pa preschool education and extensive seminar, Seminar book, Ya-Pa publications, Istanbul: 164-152.

  • Bogard, K., Traylor, F. & Takanishi, R. (2007). Teacher education and PK outcomes: Are we asking the right questions?, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23 (2008) 1–6

  • Buyukozturk, S., (2001). Experimental designs, pre-test and post–test data analyzing, Pegem Publishing, Ankara, 51-53.

  • Buyukozturk, S., (2002). Data analyzing the handbook for social science, Pegem publishing, Ankara, 171-172

  • Cartwright, K. (2002). Cognitive development and reading: The relation of reading-specific multipleclassification skill to reading comprehension in elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 56–63.

  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.

  • Conole, G., Dyke, M., Oliver, M., & Seale, J. (2004). Mapping pedagogy and tools for effective learning design. Computers & Education, 43, 17–33.

  • Erkan, S., (1993). In service training in preschool education institutions, 9th Ya-Pa Preschool education extensive seminar, 17-19 June.

  • Frost, J., (1997). Creativity in primary science, Open University press, Buckingham.

  • Gelman, R. & Brenneman, K., (2004). Science learning pathways for young children, Early Childhood with explicit Instruction, Exceptional Children, 65(1), 23–35.

  • Ginsburg. H.P. & Golbeck, S.L., (2004). Thoughts on future research on mathematics and science learning and education, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 43-50.

  • Greenes, C., Ginsburg. H.P., Balfanz, R., (2004). Big math for little Kids. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 159–166.

  • Griffin, S., (2004). Building number sense with number worlds: A mathematics Program for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19 (1), 173–180.

  • Gurdal, A., Caglar, A., Sahin, F.,Okcun, F,. and Macaroglu, E., (1993). Examples for scienceactivities in preschool period, 9th Ya-Pa preschool education and extensive seminar Ankara, Seminar book, Ya-Pa publications, Istanbul, 164-171.

  • Gutierrez, P., (1995). Empowering students with science, Mercury, 24, 34–37.

  • Henderson. A., Lucas, J., (1989). Preschool Playgroups the handbook, Unwin paperbacks, London.Howe, A. C., (1996). Development of science concepts within a Vygotskian Framework, Science Education, 80(1), 35-51.

  • Howesa, C., Burchinal, M., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., Clifford, R. & Barbarin, O. (2007).Ready to learn? Children’s pre-academic achievement in pre-Kindergarten programs, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23 (2008) 27–50

  • Kerawalla L., Pearce, D., Yuill, N., Luckin, R. & Harris, A. (2008). ‘‘I’m keeping those there, areyou?’’ The role of a new user interface paradigm – Separate Control of Shared Space (SCOSS) – in the collaborative decision-making process, Computers & Education 50 (2008) 193–206

  • Kucukturan, G., (1996). A technique in preschool: Analogy, Journal of the National Education, 157, 73-75.

  • Lipponen, L., (2000). Towards knowledge building discourse: From facts to explanations in primary students’ computer mediated discourse. Learning Environments Research, 3(2), 179–199.

  • Parker, R., (1997). Increasing faculty use of technology in teaching and teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2/3), 105–115.

  • R. Powell, D., R. Burchinal, M., File, N., & Kontos, S. (2007). An eco-behavioral analysis ofchildren’s engagement in urban public school preschool classrooms, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23 (2008) 108–123

  • Rillero, P., (1994). Doing science with your children. ERIC digests, ED 372–952

  • Sahin F., (2000). Examples for science institution and science activities in preschool, Ya-Pa publications, Istanbul.

  • Shaw. J., Blake, S. & Cliett, M. .J., (1992). Science activities for young children. Day Care and Early Education. 20 (1), 15–17.

  • Smeets, E., & Mooij, T. (2001). Pupil-centered learning, ICT and teacher behavior: observations in educational practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 403–418.

  • Smith, A., (2001). Early childhood: a wonderful time for science learning. Australian Primary and Junior Science Journal, 17 (2).

  • Tipps, S., (1982). Making better deuces: A goal in early childhood science. School Science and Mathematics, 82 (1), 29–37.

  • Ulucay, S., (1998). Science curricula in preschool education, 6th Ya-Pa preschool education and extensive seminar, Seminar book, Ya-Pa publications, Istanbul, 36-40

  • Yasar, S., (1993). Development of affective strategy in science for preschool students, 9th Ya-Papreschool education and extensive seminar Ankara, Seminar book, Ya-Pa publications, Istanbul, 140-Yılmaz, S., (1990). Evaluation of creative activities in preschool education institutions, Published Postgraduate Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics