Üçgen Aşk Kuramı Çerçevesinde Yapılan Araştırmalarda Ele Alınan Değişkenlere Yönelik Bir Derleme Çalışması

Author :  

Year-Number: 2022-57
Language : null
Konu :
Number of pages: 568-580
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Romantik ilişkilerin en önemli motivasyonu olan aşk, tüm bireylerin deneyimlemek isteyebileceği bir duygu olması ve yaşamın her döneminde yer alması nedeniyle ruh sağlığı alanında çalışan uzmanların her zaman dikkatini çekmektedir. Nitekim, psikoloji alanında romantik ilişkileri ve aşkı anlama çabasının 1970’lerle birlikte hız kazandığı ve günümüze kadar aşkla ilgili birçok kuram ve modelin ortaya konduğu görülmektedir. Özellikle son dönemlerde, üzerinde sıklıkla durulan önemli kuramlardan biri Robert Sternberg 'in Üçgen Aşk Kuramıdır. Türkiye’de yapılan araştırmalarda, romantik aşka yönelik literatür çalışmalarının eksikliğini gidermek ve alanda çalışan uzmanların araştırmalarında yol gösterici olmak amacıyla, alana katkı sunacak yeni bir kuram ile üçgen aşk düzeyini ile ilişkilendirilen değişkenlerin belirlenmesinin anlamlı olacağı düşünülmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu çalışmada, Üçgen Aşk Kuramını temel alarak yapılan aşk araştırmalarında ele alınan değişkenler incelenmiştir.

Keywords

Abstract

Love, which is the most important motivation of romantic relationships, always attracts the attention of experts working in the field of mental health, as it is an emotion that all individuals want to experience and takes place in every period of life. As a matter of fact, it is seen that the effort to understand romantic relationships and love in the field of psychology gained momentum with the 1970s and many theories and models about love have been put forward until today. Especially recently, one of the important theories that has been frequently emphasized is Robert Sternberg's Triangular Love Theory. In the studies conducted in Turkey, it is thought that it would be meaningful to determine the variables associated with the triangular love level with a new theory that will contribute to the field, in order to eliminate the lack of literature studies on romantic love and to guide the research of the experts working in the field. Therefore, in this study, the variables considered in love studies based on the Triangle Love Theory were examined.

Keywords


  • Acevedo, B. P. ve Aron, A. (2009). Does a long-term relationship kill romantic love?. Review of General

  • Acevedo, B. P. ve Aron, A. (2009). Does a long-term relationship kill romantic love?. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 59–65.

  • Acker, M. ve Davis, M. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion and commitment in adult romantic relationships: A test of the triangular theory of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(1), 21-50.

  • Ahmetoglu, G., Swami, V. ve Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The relationship between dimensions of love, personality and relationship length. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1181–1190.

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bleher, M. C., Waters, E. ve Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange stiuation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Ali, F. ve Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The dark side of love and life satisfaction: Associations withintimate relationships, psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 228– 233.

  • Andrade, A. L., Wachelkeb, J. F. R. ve Howat-Rodrigues, A. B. C. (2015). Relationship satisfaction in young adults: Gender and love dimensions. An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 9(1), 19–3.

  • Antonioni, D. (1998). Relationship between the big five personality factors and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(4), 336–55.

  • Aykutoğlu, B. (2015). Yakınlık ve tutku arasındaki ilişki: Cinsiyet, ilişki süresi ve fiziksel çekiciliğin ara etkisi, (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.

  • Bajoghli, H., Keshavarzi, Z., Mohammadi, M. R., Schmidt, N. B., Norton, P. J., Holsboer-Trachsler, E. veBrand, S. (2014). “I love you more than I can stand!”. Romantic love, symptoms of depression and anxiety,and sleep complaints are related among young adults. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 18, 169 – 174.

  • Batinic, B., Milosavljevic, M. ve Barisic, J. (2016). The influence of attachment styles on romantic love. European Psychiatry, 33, 642-642.

  • Berry, D. S. ve Hansen, J. S. (2000). Personality, nonverbal behavior, and interaction quality in female dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 278–292.

  • Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54(4), 260–266.

  • Byrne, B. M. ve Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalentmeasurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(5), 555-574.

  • Campbell, W. K., Foster, C. A. ve Finkel, E. J. (2002). Does self-love lead to love for others? A story of narcissistic game playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 340–354.

  • Caralis, D. ve Haslam, N. (2004). Relational tendencies associated with broad personality dimensions.Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 77, 397–402.Cassepp-Borges, V. ve Teodoro,M. L. M. (2007). Propriedades psicométricas da versão brasileira da escala triangular do amor de sternberg. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 20(3), 513-522.

  • Crevier, M. G., Poulin, F. ve Boislard, P. (2012). Continuite´ entre les relations parentales et amicales a`l’adolescence et les relations amoureuses a` l’aˆge adulte e´mergent. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 44(3), 222–230.

  • Dana, H. S. ve Saberi, H. (2015). Predicting Marital Satisfaction According to Love-Making Styles (Intimacy, Desire, Commitment) and Anxiety. Journal of Family Research, 10(4): 511-527.

  • Davis, K. E. ve Latty-Mann, H. (1987). Love styles and relationship quality: A contribution to validation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(4), 409-428.

  • Deeb, J.S. (1989). Evaluating the relationship between Sternberg’s triangular theory of love and maritalsatisfaction. (Doctoral Dissertation, State University Of New York at Albany, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International. 51-03B. 1546.

  • Dehestani, M., Sharabiani, S. G., Nooripour, R., & Zanganeh, F. (2018). Prediction of depression symptomsbased on personality traits and romantic relationships among students. Journal Research & Health, 8(2), 173- 181.

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well- being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.

  • Dietch, J. (1978). Love, sex roles and psychological health. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42(6), 626-Dion, K. K. ve Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 53-69.

  • Drahanovic, S. ve Hasanagic, A. (2014). Exploring the difference between Turkish and Bosnian students in Triangular Love Scale. Epiphany Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies, 7(2), 128-141.

  • Engel, G., Olson, K. R. ve Patrick, C. (2002). The personality of love: Fundamental motives and traits related to components of love. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(5), 839-853.

  • Falconi, A ve Mullet, E. (2003). Cognitive algebra of love through the adult life. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 57(3), 275-290.

  • Fatimah, S. (2018). Hubungan Cinta Komitmen dengan Kepuasan Pernikahan dimoderatori oleh Kebersyukuran.

  • Feeney, J. A. ve Noller, P. (1990). Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 281-291.

  • Fehr, B. ve Broughton, R. (2001). Gender and personality differences in conceptions of love: An interpersonal theory analysis. Personal Relationships, 8, 115–136.

  • Fisher, H. E. (1992). Anatomy of love: Natural history of monogamy, adultery and divorce. New York: Norton.

  • Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A. ve Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship qualitycomponents: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340-Frias, M. T., Shaver, P. R. ve Dıaz-Loving, R. (2014). Individualism and collectivism as moderators of theassociation between attachment insecurities, coping and social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31(1), 3–31.

  • Galinha, I. C., Oishi, S., Pereira, C. R., Wirtz, D. ve Francisco, E. (2014). Adult attachment, love styles,relationship experiences and subjective well-being: Cross-cultural and gender comparison between americans, portuguese and mozambicans. Social Indicators Research, 119, 823–852.

  • Gao, G. (2001). Intimacy, passion, and commitment in Chinese and US American romantic relationships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25, 329–342.

  • García, F. E., García Escobar, C., Hein, H., Hernández, Á., Torres, P., Valdebenito, R., & Vera, C. (2017).Relaciones de pareja homosexual y heterosexual: un estudio comparativo. Actualidades en Psicología, 31(122), 31-43.

  • Gere, J. ve Macdonald, G. (2013). Assessing relationship quality across cultures: An examination of measurement equivalence. Personal Relationships, 20, 422–442.

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34.

  • Gouveia, V. V., Fonseca, P. N., Cavalcanti, J. P. N., Diniz, P. K. C., & Dória, L. C. (2009). Versão abreviadada Escala Triangular do Amor: Evidências de validade fatorial e consistência interna. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 14(1), 31-39.

  • Graham, J. M. ve Christiansen, K. (2009). The reliability of romantic love: A reliability generalization meta- analysis. Personal Relationships, 16, 49–66.

  • Ha, T., Overbeek, G., Greef, M., Scholte, R. H. J. ve. Engel, R. C. M. E. (2010). The importance ofrelationships with parents and best friends for adolescents romantic relationship quality: Differences betweenindigenous and ethnic Dutch adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(2), 121–127.

  • Haack, K. R., & Falcke, D. (2014). Love and Marital Quality in Romantic Relationships Mediated and Non-Mediated by Internet. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 24(57), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-Hofstede, G. (1984). The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management review, 9(3), 389-398.

  • Karantzas, G. C., Feeney, J. A, Goncalves, C. V. ve McCabe, M. P. (2014). Towards an integrative attachment-based model of relationship functioning. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 413–434.

  • Kın NG, T. ve Cheng, C. H. K. (2010). The effects of ıntimacy, passion, and commitment on satisfaction inromantic relationships among hong kong chinese people. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 11(2), 123-146.

  • Kim, J. ve Hatfield E. (2004). Love types and subjective well-being: A cross- cultural study. Social Behavior and Personality, 32(2), 173-182.

  • Knox, D., Schacht, C. ve Zusman, M. E. (1999). Love relationships among college students. College Student Journal, 33(1), 149-151.

  • Le, B. ve Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.

  • Lemieux, R. ve Hale, J. L. (2000). Intimacy, passion and commitment among married ındividuals: further testing of the triangular of love. Psychological Reports, 87, 941-948.

  • Levy, M. B. ve Davis, K. E. (1988). Lovestyles and attachment styles compared: Their relations to each other and to various relationship characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 439–471.

  • Madey, S. F. ve Rodgers, L. (2009). The effect of attachment and sternberg’s triangular theory of love on relationship satisfaction. Individual Differences Research, 7(2), 76-84.

  • Mallandain, I. ve Davies, M. (1994). The colours of love: Personality correlates of love styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 557–560.

  • Mamali, C. (2014). A vectorial construct of love and hate and Sternberh' Triangular Model: Towards an integrated model of love and hate. International Journal of Psychology, 39(5), 16- 32.

  • Mansoobifar, M., Mujembar, A. K ve Keybollahi, T. (2012). The correlation between identity status and loving elements (intimacy, commitment, passion). Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1167 – 1170.

  • Masaryk, R. H. (2012). Conceptualizing love: Is it all we need?.Human Affairs, 22(2), 263–269.

  • Murray, S. L, Holmes, J. G. ve Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641– 666.

  • Murray, S. L. ve Holmes, J. G. (2009). The architecture of interdependent minds: A motivationmanagement theory of mutual responsiveness. Psychological Review, 116, 908– 928.

  • Nabelkova, E. Ve Balazova, N. (2015). Authenticity in partnership of young adults – correlation study. Československá psychologie, 59(1), 81-93.

  • Neto, F. (2012). Perceptions of love and sex across the adult life span. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(6), 760–775.

  • Overbeek, G., Ha, T., Scholte, R., Kemp, R. ve Engels, R. C. M. E. (2007). Brief report: Intimacy, passion andcommitment in romantic relationships-Validation of a ‘triangular love scale’ for adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 523–528.

  • Panayiotou, G. (2005). Love, commitment, and response to conflict among Cypriot dating couples: Two models, one relationship. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 108–117.

  • Pielage, S. B., Luteijn, F. ve Arrindell, W. A. (2005). Adult attachment, ıntimacy and psychological distress in a clinical and community sample. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 12, 455–464.

  • Pines, A. M. (2003). Aşk ve kıskançlık (C. Yonsel, Çev.). İstanbul: Okyan Us Yayınları.

  • Pines, A. M. (2010). Aşık olmak: Sevgililerimizi neye göre seçeriz? (M. Yurdakuler Uluengin, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

  • Ratelle, C. F., Carbonneau, N., Vallerand, R. J. ve Mageau, G. (2012). Passion in the romantic sphere: A look at relational outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 106–120.

  • Reeder, H. M. (1996). The subjective experience of love through adult life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 43(4), 325-40.

  • Reis, H. T. ve Aron, A. (2008). Love what is it, why does it matter, and how does it operate?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 80-86.

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

  • Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2003). Testing theories of romantic development from adolescence to young adulthood:Evidence of a developmental sequence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(6), 519–531.

  • Shulman, S., Walsh, S. D., Weisman, O. ve Schelyer, M. (2009). Romantic contexts, sexual behavior and depressive symptoms in adolescent males and females. Sex Roles, 61, 850–863.

  • Simpson, J. A., Campbell, B. ve Berscheid, E. (1986). The association between romantic love and marriage: Kephart (1967) twice revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 363– 372.

  • Snyder, D. K., Castellani, A. M. ve Whisman, M. A. (2006). Current status and future directions in couple therapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 317–344.

  • Soloski, K. L., Pavkov, T. W., Sweeney, K. A. ve Wetchler, J. L. (2013). The social construction of love through intergenerational processes. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35, 773–792.

  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38(1), 15-28.

  • Sprecher, S. (2001). Equity and social exchange in dating couples: Associations with satisfaction, commitment and stability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 599–613.

  • Sprecher, S., Aron, A., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E. ve Levitskaya, A. (1994). Love: American style, Russian style and Japanese style. Personal Relafionships, 1, 349-369.

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135.Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 313-335.

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2013). Searching for love. British Psychological Society, 26(2), 98-101.

  • Sternberg, R. J., Hojjat, M. ve Barnes, M. L. (2001). Empirical aspects of a theory of love as a story. European Journal of Personality, 15, 1–20.

  • Sumter, S. R., Valkenburg, P. M. ve Peter, J. (2013). Perceptions of love across the lifespan: Differences in passion, intimacy and commitment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(5), 417–427.

  • Swami, V. ve Allum, L. (2012). Perceptions of the physical attractiveness of the self, current romantic- partners, and former partners. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 89–95.

  • Swami, V., Furnham, A., Haubner, T., Stieger, S. ve Voracek, M. (2009).The truth ıs out there: The structureof beliefs about extraterrestrial life among austrian and british respondents. The Journal of Social Psychology, 48(2), 29-

  • Tang, S. ve Zuo, J. (2000). Dating attitudes and behaviors of American and Chinese college students. The Social Science Journal, 3(1), 67-78.

  • Tarabulsy,G. M., Larose, S., Bernier, A. ve Trottier, K. (2012). Attachment states of mind in late adolescenceand the quality and course of romantic relationships in adulthood. Attachment and Human Development, 14(6), 621–643.

  • Taylor, S. E. ve Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.

  • Torqabeh, M. H. ve Abadi, A. F. ve Haqshenas, H. (2006). Relations between love styles and marital satisfaction. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 16(54), 99-109.

  • Watson, S. L. ve Ward, J. P. (1996). Temperament and problem solving in the small-eared bushbaby (Otolemur garnettii). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 377-385.

  • Watts, S. ve Stenner, P. (2005). The subjective experience of partnership love: A methodological study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 85-107.

  • Weigel, D. J., Davis, B. A. ve Woodard, K. C. (2015). A two-sided coin: Mapping perceptions of the pros and cons of relationship commitment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(3), 344-367.

  • Whatley, S. (2008). Archives of the Dance: Siobhan Davies Dance Online. Dance Research, 26(2), 244-257.

  • White, J. K., Hendrick, S. S. ve Hendrick, C. (2004). Big five personality variables and relationship constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1519–1530.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics